Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Estimating Value Added Tax Gap in Uzbekistan

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-2-131-139

Abstract

The subject of the paper is to study of the theoretical literature on evaluate the effectiveness of the value added tax (VAT) mechanism, and identification of criteria for the analysis of the VAT mechanism. The purpose of the paper is to investigate methods for evaluating the effectiveness of VAT mechanism and, on that basis, to evaluate the VAT gap in Uzbekistan and the factors influencing it. The importance of the paper is confirmed by the significant contribution of the tax to the sufficiency and stability of budget revenue in countries with consumption tax mechanisms. A mathematical approach based on the C-efficiency (Collection efficiency) ratio is used to calculate the VAT gap. This model evaluates the discrepancy between actual VAT income and the maximum amount of tax revenue that could be obtained by taxing all (and only) final consumer spending in the economy. The novelty of the paper is justified by adaptation of model to the specification of VAT structure of Uzbekistan and recent data to estimate VAT gap. The research concluded that Uzbekistan’s VAT mechanism is twice as inefficient as its ideal mechanism. Estimates for 2016 and 2020 indicate that on average a quarter of potential VAT revenue is not collected due to Compliance Gap, while Policy Gap is responsible for over a third of the ideal loss of VAT revenue. In order to improve compliance, it is recommended to optimize the collection and control systems in addition to policy modifications that include reforms of tax objects, subjects, rates, incentives, and other tax elements.

About the Author

I. M. Niyazmetov
The Banking and Finance Academy of Republic of Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan

Islombek M. Niyazmetov - Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Head of department of Tax policy

Tashkent


Competing Interests:

автор заявляет об отсутствии конфликта интересов



References

1. Kowal A., Przekota G. VAT efficiency — a discussion on the VAT system in the European Union. Sustainability. 2021;13(9):4768. DOI: 10.3390/su13094768

2. Mudiyanselage H. K., Chen S. X. What impairs the ‘money machine’ of VAT in developing countries? International Tax and Public Finance. 2022;29(5):1128–1159. DOI: 10.1007/s10797–021–09705-x

3. Hoseini M., Briand O. Production efficiency and self-enforcement in value-added tax: Evidence from state-level reform in India. Journal of Development Economics. 2020;144:102462. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102462

4. Rakhmonov А., Safarov U. Compliance and administrative problems of Uzbekistan’s VAT mechanism. Society and Innovations. 2021;2(S 7):113–137. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47689/2181–1415-vol2-iss7/S-pp113–137

5. Ebrill L., Keen M., Bodin J.-P., Summers V. The modern VAT. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2001. 241 p. URL: https://www.joserobertoafonso.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/07173-9781451931761.pdf

6. Keen M. The anatomy of the VAT. IMF Working Paper. 2013;(111). URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/wp13111.pdf

7. Bruno R. L. Tax enforcement, tax compliance and tax morale in transition economies: A theoretical model. European Journal of Political Economy. 2019;56:193–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.08.006

8. Alm J., Kasper M. Using behavioural economics to understand tax compliance. Economic and Political Studies. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/20954816.2022.2117676

9. Ueda J. The evolution of potential VAT revenues and C-efficiency in advanced economies. IMF Working Paper. 2017;(158). DOI: 10.5089/9781484305874.001

10. Poniatowski G., Bonch-Osmolovskiy M., Durán-Cabré J., Esteller-Moré A., Śmietanka A. Study and reports on the VAT gap in the EU-28 member states: 2019 final report. Vienna: IHS, Institute for Advanced Studies; 2019. 79 p. (TAXUD/2015/CC/131). URL: https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-09/vat-gap-fullreport-2019_en.pdf

11. Lešnik T., Jagrič T., Jagrič V. VAT gap dependence and fiscal administration measures. Naše gospodarstvo/Our Economy. 2018;64(2):43–51. DOI: 10.2478/ngoe-2018–0011

12. Thackray M., Alexova M. The revenue administration — gap analysis program: An analytical framework for excise gap estimation. IMF Technical Notes and Manuals. 2017;(05). URL: https://www.imf.org›Files›TNM›tnm1705

13. Hutton E. The revenue administration — gap analysis program: Model and methodology for value-added tax gap estimation. IMF Technical Notes and Manuals. 2017;(04). URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/TNM/Issues/2017/04/07/The-Revenue-AdministrationGap-Analysis-Program-Model-and-Methodology-for-Value-Added-Tax-Gap-44715

14. Pluskota A. VAT gap determinants in the European Union and Poland. Ekonomia i Prawo/Economics and Law. 2022;21(3):623–633. DOI: 10.12775/EiP.2022.033

15. Tarhova E. VAT split payment — a tricky matter of aiming at the best design and combination. Financial Law Review. 2021;21(1):107–124. DOI: 10.4467/22996834FLR.21.008.13637


Review

For citations:


Niyazmetov I.M. Estimating Value Added Tax Gap in Uzbekistan. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2023;27(2):131-139. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-2-131-139

Views: 332


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)