PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP, “TRIPLE HELIX” AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2016-20-4-6-16
Abstract
The article offers an updated vision of interaction between business and society in Russia; it argues that the Russia’s current economic crisis is of systemic nature, and numerous international rankings have been asserting this fact. It offers insight into the main problem of modern Russia - the problem of national security - formulated in the new National Security Strategy (2016). “A social action triangle” for big business is considered as a possible solution to this problem. It includes: public-private partnerships (investment projects), “an innovative triple helix” (innovative projects) and corporate social responsibility (social projects carried out in line with the major activities. Realizing, shaping and implementing new business practices in Russia should be accomplished via support of civil society values by infrastructure monopolies. The highest level of philanthropy in CSR format is a turn of the business from charity to social, economic and infrastructure projects, i.e. establishing partnerships that focus on collaboration based on long-term national interests. To back this new trend, the format of socially oriented public- private investment projects is suggested.
References
1. Dezhina I. Vostrebovannost’ rossijskoj nauki: otrazhenie v strategicheskih dokumentah strany [Demand for Russian science: the reflection in the strategic documents of the country]. Jekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii – Journal of Russia’s economic development, 2016, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 93–96 (in Russian).
2. Tsvetkov V.A. Pjat’ problem jekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti i jekonomicheskogo rosta v sovremennoj Rossii [Economic security and economic growth in modern Russia: five key problems]. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta — Bulletin of Financial university, 2014, no. 4, pp. 6–22 (in Russian).
3. Etzkovitz H., Leydcsdorff L. The Dynamic of Innovations: from National System and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Research Policy, 2000, vol. 29, pp. 109–123.
4. Aganbegyan A. O preodolenii sushhestvujushhej recessii i stagfljacii: otkrytaja lekcija [On overcoming the current recession and stagflation: a public lecture]. St. Petersburg: The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation branch, 2015. 40 p. (in Russian).
5. Shestak V. Jekonomiko-tehnologicheskoe prostranstvo Rossii [Economic and technological space of Russia]. Vestnik RAEN — Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, 2016, no. 1, pp. 58–62 (in Russian).
6. Glazyev S. O neotlozhnyh merah po ukrepleniju jekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti Rossii i vyvodu rossijskoj jekonomiki na traektoriju operezhajushhego razvitija: doklad. Nauchnyj sovet RAN po kompleksnym problemam evrazijskoj jekonomicheskoj integracii, modernizacii, konkurentosposobnosti i ustojchivomu razvitiju [On urgent measures to strengthen the economic security of Russia and the withdrawal of the Russian economy on the path of advanced development: report. Scientific Councilon the complex problems of the Eurasian economic integration, modernization, competitiveness and sustainable development]. Moscow, Institute for Economic Strategies, Russian Biographical Institute, 2015. 60 p. (in Russian).
7. Fredy Kurniawan a.o. Best practice for financial models of PPP projects. The 5th International Conference of Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum (EACEF-5). Procedia Engineering, 125 (2015), pp. 124–132.
8. Dezhina I. Vostrebovannost’ rossijskoj nauki: otrazhenie v strategicheskih dokumentah strany [Demand for Russian science: the reflection in the strategic documents of the country]. Jekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii – Journal of Russia’s economic development, 2016, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 93–96 (in Russian).
9. Carroll Archie B., Shabana Kareem M. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, March 2010, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 85–105.
10. Etzkovitz H., Leydcsdorff L. The Dynamic of Innovations: from National System and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Research Policy, 2000, vol. 29, pp. 109–123.
11. Shestak V. Jekonomiko-tehnologicheskoe prostranstvo Rossii [Economic and technological space of Russia]. Vestnik RAEN — Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, 2016, no. 1, pp. 58–62 (in Russian).
12. Fredy Kurniawan a.o. Best practice for financial models of PPP projects. The 5th International Conference of Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum (EACEF-5). Procedia Engineering, 125 (2015), pp. 124–132.
13. Carroll Archie B., Shabana Kareem M. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, March 2010, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 85–105.
Review
For citations:
Shestak V.P. PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP, “TRIPLE HELIX” AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2016;20(4):6-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2016-20-4-6-16
Views:
688
Email this article 