Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Assessing the Feasibility of Establishing special Economic Zones: Geo-economic Mapping Method

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-2-6-22

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to systematize factors of successful and sustainable functioning of special economic zones, as well as to develop tools to map of zones on a map of a country with the competitive advantages of individual territories identified therein in order to make recommendations for improving the zonal policy. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that in the context of global shocks, a special preferential regime, flexible governance models of special economic zones are not determinants of their successful application in order to promote national investment strategies. The geo-economic advantages of the territories within which the special economic zones operate come to the fore. Such advantages are the basis for the formation of poles of economic, commercial, industrial and innovative growth. The use of methods of theoretical (analysis, synthesis, generalization) and empirical (comparison, measurement) research allowed the authors to reveal the content of effects associated with the functioning of special zones, to highlight the problems of their measurement; to generalize the features of preferential regimes of Russia; to systematize the geo-economic factors of successful and sustainable operation of special zones. The method of geo-economic mapping was used to identify the correspondence between the competitive advantages of territories and special zones created within their borders. As a result, it is proposed to classify key geo-economic factors that determine the potential successful functioning of special zones into three groups: spatial, economic and organizational. These groups of factors, according to the authors, should be considered in terms of formation and retention of geo-economic advantages: general, caused by public management and specialized. The method of geo-economic mapping identifies regions whose special zones correspond to the level of development of the identified geo-economic advantages, as well as those whose conditions are most likely not to maximize the effect of the special zones localized in their territory. It is recommended to establish a system for monitoring the conformity of specialization of regions with the profile of special economic zones established within their borders.

About the Authors

E. V. Sapir
P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
Russian Federation

Elena V. Sapir — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of Department for World Economy and Statistics, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University.

Yaroslavl


Competing Interests:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.



I. A. Karachev
P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University; Yaroslavl Region Government
Russian Federation

Igor A. Karachev — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Department for World Economy and Statistics, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University; Head of the Financial Department of the Yaroslavl Region Government.

Yaroslavl


Competing Interests:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.



References

1. Mohiuddin M., Regniere M.-H., Su A., Su Z. The special economic zone as a locomotive for green development in China. Asian Social Science. 2014;10(18):109–121. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v10n18p109

2. Tantri M.L. Special economic zones in India: Are these enclaves efficient? The Institute for Social and Economic Change Working Paper. 2011;(274). URL: https://www.isec.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WP-274-Malini-L-T_5.pdf

3. Gechert S., Heimberger P. Do corporate tax cuts boost economic growth? European Economic Review. 2022;147:104157. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104157

4. Guceri I., Albinowski M. Investment responses to tax policy under uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics. 2021;141(3):1147–1170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.04.032

5. Moretti E. Place-based policies and geographical inequalities. IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities. 2022. URL: https://ifs.org.uk/inequality/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Place-based-policies-and-geographical-inequalites-ifs-deaton-review-of-inequalities.pdf

6. Карачев И.А., Сапир Е.В. Специальные экономические зоны России и Китая: оценка возникающих эффектов. Теоретическая экономика. 2020;(8):71–81.

7. Frick S.A., Rodríguez-Pose A., Wong M.D. Toward economically dynamic special economic zones in emerging countries. Economic Geography. 2019;95(1):30–64. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2018.1467732

8. Manasan R.G. Export processing zones, special economic zones: Do we really need to have more of them? Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Policy Notes. 2013;(15). URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/policy-notes/export-processing-zones-special-economic-zones-do-we-really-need-to-have-more-of-them

9. Cheng T. From special economic zones to greater special economic region — Hong Kong special administrative region as a model for legal infrastructure design. Transnational Corporations. 2019;26(3):63–87. DOI: 10.18356/759ea4c6-en

10. Cheong T.E. The key success factors of special economic zones. Surbana Jurong Group Perspectives. 2018;(28). URL: https://surbanajurong.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Perspectives_28.pdf

11. Farole T. Special economic zones in Africa: Comparing performance and learning from global experience. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2011. 328 p. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/09b3def8–3a52–58d7–837a-b63bd5b9a4e0/content

12. Kuznetsov A., Kuznetsova O. The success and failure of Russian SEZs: Some policy lessons. Transnational Corporations. 2019;26(2):117–140. DOI: 10.18356/89dba835-en

13. Zeng D.Z. Special economic zones: Lessons from the global experience. PEDL Synthesis Paper Series. 2016;(1). URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/586f9727e5274a130700012d/PEDL_Synthesis_Paper_Piece_No_1.pdf.

14. Zeng D.Z. The dos and don’ts of special economic zones. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2021. 18 p. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/1c76bc4d-3a36–556d-891b-97f762a80d91/content

15. Мякшин В.Н., Петров В.Н., Песьякова Т.Н. Управление инвестиционными процессами в субъектах Российской Федерации на основе сбалансированной системы показателей. Финансы: теория и практика. 2023;27(2):38–49. DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2023–27–2–38–49

16. Сапир Е.В., Карачев И.А. Геоэкономический атлас Ярославской области как инструмент формирования кластерной политики региона. Ярославль: ЯрГУ; 2015. 144 с.

17. Narula R., Zhan J.-X. Using special economic zones to facilitate development: Policy implications. Transnational Corporations. 2019;26(2):1–26. DOI: 10.18356/72e19b3c-en

18. Hsu W.-K.K., Huang S.-H.S, Huynh N.T. An evaluation model for foreign direct investment performance of free trade port zones. Promet — Traffic & Transportation. 2021;33(6):859–870. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v33i6.3844

19. Brussevich M. Socio-economic spillovers from special economic zones: Evidence from Cambodia. IMF Working Paper. 2020;(170). DOI: 10.5089/9781513554457.001

20. Frick S., Rodríguez-Pose A. Are special economic zones in emerging countries a catalyst for the growth of surrounding areas? Transnational Corporations. 2019;26(2):75–94. DOI: 10.18356/0554caef-en


Review

For citations:


Sapir E.V., Karachev I.A. Assessing the Feasibility of Establishing special Economic Zones: Geo-economic Mapping Method. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(2):6-22. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-2-6-22

Views: 572


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)