Capital Adequacy Ratio — a Panacea for Indian Banks during COVID-19 Pandemic
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-2-50-59
Abstract
A stable financial system acts as a catalyst for the economic growth and development of a country. The healthy banking sector is the core of a sustainable economy as banks act as intermediaries between depositors and lenders of money. In the surge of the COVID-19 pandemic, the financial sector witnessed significant transitions in terms of digital transformation. In India, the banking sector has remained resilient throughout the pandemic due to government and regulators’ policy efforts and the maintenance of capital adequacy requirements. Banks have maintained higher capital buffers, better liquidity requirements, and lower leverage, cushions against pandemic shock. In the present paper, the researcher provides a conceptual elucidation of Basel norms, analyzes the component-wise Capital to Risk-Weighted Asset Ratio (CRAR) of Indian Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs) and examines the CRAR position of SCBs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study also evaluated the distribution of SCBs by CRAR and examined the capital ratios of public, private, and foreign sector banks from 2016 to 2022. The ANOVA analysis output revealed a significant difference in the CRAR of public, private, and foreign banks. The study concludes that adequate CAR levels help banks mitigate the risks that arise during pandemic crises and aid them in conducting their banking operations effortlessly. Further, it concludes that public sector banks (PSBs) still lag behind their counterparts in maintaining adequate CRAR, and hence, they need to reduce the accumulation of risk-weighted assets (RWA).
About the Authors
N. FatimaIndia
Nikhat Fatima — PhD, Assist. Prof., Aligarh College of Engineering & Technology (ACET).
Aligarh
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
N. Singhal
India
Nikita Singhal — PhD, Associate Prof., School of Commerce and Management, IIMT University.
Meerut
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
S. Goyal
India
Shikha Goyal — Assis. Prof., Amity Law School, Amity University.
Noida
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
R. Sheikh
India
Roshan Sheikh — PhD, Assist. Prof., Aligarh College of Engineering & Technology (ACET).
Aligarh
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
P. Sharma
India
Pooja Sharma — PhD, Assist. Prof., School of Commerce and Management, IIMT University.
Meerut
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
1. Gupta S. K., Aggarwal N., Gupta N. Financial institutions and markets. Noida: Kalyani Publishers; 2018. 375 p.
2. Singh S. Banking sector reforms in India. New Delhi: Kanishka Publishers; 2007. 208 p.
3. Das N.M., Rout B.S. Banks’ capital adequacy ratio: A panacea or placebo. Decision. 2020;47(3):303–318. DOI: 10.1007/s40622–020–00255–5
4. Navas J., Dhanavanthan P., Lazar D. How have Indian banks adjusted their capital ratios to meet the regulatory requirements? An empirical analysis. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2020;7(11):1113–1122. DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.1113
5. Dao B. T.T., Nguyen K. A. Bank capital adequacy ratio and bank performance in Vietnam: A simultaneous equations framework. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2020;7(6):39–56. DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.039
6. Rai A., Viswanathan K. G., White N. Implementation of Basel Capital Ratios by Indian banks. Journal of Business & Financial Affairs. 2017;6(2):1–4. DOI: 10.4172/2167–0234.1000264
7. Goel S., Kumar R. Comparing capital adequacy ratio of Indian public sector banks in view of Basel II Norms. Journal of Management Sciences and Technology. 2016; 3(2):20–25. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316351347_Comparing_Capital_Adequacy_Ratio_of_Indian_Public_Sector_Banks_in_View_of_Basel_II_Norms
8. Vishwanathan N. S. Basel III implementation — challenges for Indian banking system. Associated Chambers of Commerce & Industry in India. Aug. 31, 2015. URL: https://www.bis.org/review/r150917a.pdf
9. Kumar J., Selvan R. T. Capital adequacy determinants and profitability of selected Indian commercial banks. Global Journal for Research Analysis. 2014;3(11):57–59. URL: https://www.worldwidejournals.com/global-journal-for-research-analysis-GJRA/special_issues_pdf/November_2014_147652838440.pdf
10. Aspal P. K., Nazneen A. An empirical analysis of capital adequacy in the Indian private sector banks. American Journal of Research Communication. 2014;2(11):28–42. URL: http://www.usa-journals.com/wp-content/uploads/2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0wfMefvmmg014/10/Aspal_Vol211.pdf
11. Jayadev M. Basel III implementation: Issues and challenges for Indian banks. IIMB Management Review. 2013;25(2):115–130. DOI: 10.1016/j.iimb.2013.03.010
12. Mahapatra B. Implications of Basel III for capital, liquidity and profitability of banks. National Institute of Bank Management. Mar. 03, 2012. URL: https://www.bis.org/review/r120305b.pdf
13. Prakash A. Evolution of the Basel framework on bank capital regulation. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers. 2008;29(2):81–122. URL: http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/RBIMONS08F.pdf
14. Jackson S. L. Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., Inc.; 2008. 430 p.
Review
For citations:
Fatima N., Singhal N., Goyal S., Sheikh R., Sharma P. Capital Adequacy Ratio — a Panacea for Indian Banks during COVID-19 Pandemic. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(2):50-59. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-2-50-59