Prospects for Export of Goods from Turkey to the European Union Countries in the Context of Carbon Taxation

The subject of the study is the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), one of the European climate regulation tools aimed at curbing the “carbon leakage” that occurs when importing goods from countries with less stringent climate regulation to countries with more stringent regulation. For this reason, the carbon tax affects the interests of exporters of carbon-intensive goods to the EU, especially Russia, Turkey, China, which will suffer the greatest damage. The purpose of the paper is to assess the dynamics of the export of Turkish goods to the EU countries and to determine Turkey’s position on the introduction of a carbon tax. One of the main tasks of the work is to determine the extent to which Turkey supports Russia in the EU’s opposition to the introduction of this tax. The research methodology is based on the use of statistical analysis methods (sampling, comparison, grouping, etc.) and analysis of identified trends. An analysis of the dynamics and structure of trade between the EU and Turkey led to the following results: 1) Turkey is one of the leading countries exporting carbon-intensive products to the EU; 2) The existence of a weak dependence of the EU on carbon-intensive Turkish goods due to the differentiation of its imports and, conversely, a strong dependence of the Turkish economy on the EU due to the significant orientation of Turkish exports to EU markets. It is concluded that Turkey is in a difficult situation in connection with the CBAM. On the one hand, there is a threat of a decrease in the competitiveness of products of the cement, mechanical, and metallurgical industries; on the other hand, national companies are successfully integrated into European production chains, and the strategy of adaptation to the European Green Deal may be preferable both for them and the national economy as a whole. Therefore, there is a possibility that Turkey will take a “pro-European” position. If a “pro-European” position prevails, this will create additional risks for the Russian Federation in the fight against EU carbon taxation.

1. Köppl A., Schratzenstaller M. Carbon taxation: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2023;37(4):1353–1388. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12531

2. Rossetto D. The carbon border adjustment mechanism: What does it mean for steel recycling? Sustainable Horizons. 2023;5:100048. DOI: 10.1016/j.horiz.2023.100048

3. Mörsdorf G. A simple fix for carbon leakage? Assessing the environmental effectiveness of the EU carbon border adjustment. Energy Policy. 2022;161:112596. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112596

4. Bellora C., Fontagné L. EU in search of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Energy Economics. 2023;123:106673. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106673

5. Beaufils T., Ward H., Jakob M., Wenz L. Assessing different European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism implementations and their impact on trade partners. Communications Earth & Environment. 2023;4:131. 10.1038/s43247–023–00788–4

6. Zhang J., Zhang Y. Carbon tax, tourism CO2 emissions and economic welfare. Annals of Tourism Research. 2018;69:18–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2017.12.009

7. Göktaş L., Çetin G. Tourist tax for sustainability: Determining willingness to pay. European Journal of Tourism Research. 2023;35:3503. DOI: 10.54055/ejtr.v35i.2813

8. Slobtsova O. I. Recycling fee. Bukhgalterskii uchet. 2012;(11):14–16. (In Russ.).

9. Zhong J., Pei J. Beggar thy neighbor? On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EU’s proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Policy. 2022;162:112802. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112802

10. Overland I., Sabyrbekov R. Know your opponent: Which countries might fight the European carbon border adjustment mechanism? Energy Policy. 2022;169:113175. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113175

11. Abanina I. N., Minchichova V. S., Ogloblina E. V. Endogenous and exogenous contradictions in the introduction of carbon border adjustment mechanism in the European Union. Modern Economy Success. 2023;(2):42–50. (In Russ.).

12. Abramov V. L. Analysis of the carbon regulation of the European Union as a mechanism of protectionism. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Economic Sciences. 2022;(214):253–256. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14451/1.214.253

13. Roginko S. A., Silvestrov S. N. Implementation of the Paris Agreement on Global Climate: European carbon blackmail of Russia and possibilities of countering it. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Russian Economic Journal. 2021;(4):77–93. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33983/0130–9757–2021–4–77–93

14. Roginko S. A. Climate agenda in current situation: Advices for Russian economy. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii = Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2022;236(4):447– 465. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.38197/2072–2060–2022–236–4–447–465

15. Kashbrasiev R. V. Factors of Turkey’s economic development in the 21st century. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii = The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology. 2021;(1):170–173. (In Russ.).

16. Simola H. CBAM! — Assessing potential costs of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism for emerging economies. BOFIT Policy Brief. 2021;(10). URL: https://publications.bof.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/44898/bpb1021.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 24.07.2023).

17. Lipscomb C. A., Kashbrasiev R. V. Using county typologies to inform job tax credit policy in Georgia. Review of Regional Studies. 2008;38(2):233–250. DOI: 10.52324/001c.8265

18. Acar S., Aşıcı A. A., Yeldan A. E. Potential effects of the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on the Turkish economy. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2022;24(6):8162–8194. DOI: 10.1007/s10668–021–01779–1

19. Magacho G., Espagne E., Godin A. Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: Consequences for developing countries. Climate Policy. 2024;24(2):243–259. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758

20. Uyduranoglu A., Ozturk S. S. Public support for carbon taxation in Turkey: Drivers and barriers. Climate Policy. 2020;20(9):1175–1191. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1816887

21. SarigüL S.S., Topcu B. A. The impact of environmental taxes on carbon dioxide emissions in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Economic Studies. 2021;3(1):43–54. URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1820690