Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Circular Economy Goals, Large Capitalisation, and ESG Funds: An Investment Perspective

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-2-206-218

Abstract

In the context of an obvious 32% growth, the relationship between the circular economy, risks and returns is becoming increasingly relevant. ESG indicators are increasingly pivotal in global investment decisions. The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that ESG-mandated companies are more likely to yield sustainable long-term performance, advocating for investors to consider ESG-based mutual fund schemes. The research evaluates the performance of the top 10 high-capitalization and ESG equity funds, comparing them to the Nifty-50 benchmark index using various performance metrics. An increasing trend in ESG-compliant investing is observed, contributing to the circular economy. It was concluded that even post-risk adjustment, ESG funds remain lucrative, offering sound long-term returns. Statistically significant returns are noted in both funds and index. The study recommends companies revise policies towards ESG compliance and investors kindness ESG funds. The novelty of the study is that it gives a new insight into the performance of two different categories of funds, how well circular economy strategies can contain investment risk and provide risk-adjusted returns.

About the Authors

R. Anvekar
KLE Technological University
India

Rohini Anvekar — Student, School of Management Studies and Research, KLE Technological University.

Vidyanagar, Hubballi


Competing Interests:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. 



S. Patil
MIT Vishwaprayag University
India

Sagar Patil — PhD, Assist. Prof., School of Business, MIT Vishwaprayag University.

Sollapur, Maharashtra


Competing Interests:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. 



References

1. Beloskar V. D., Rao S. V.D.N. Did ESG save the day? Evidence from India during the COVID-19 crisis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets. 2023;30(1):73–107. DOI: 10.1007/s10690–022–09369–5

2. The circular economy as a de-risking strategy and driver of superior risk-adjusted returns. Isle of Wight: Ellen MacArthur Foundation; 2021. 27 p. URL: https://iris.unibocconi.it/bitstream/11565/4044096/2/EMF_ISP%20_UniBo_CE%20%26%20risk-paper%20Final%20190721%20reduced.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2022).

3. Rao K.V., Daita N. Performance evaluation of selected Mutual Fund growth schemes. JIMS 8M: The Journal of Indian Management & Strategy. 2010;15(1):29–33.

4. Goyal M. M. Performance evaluation of top 10 mutual funds in India. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies. 2015;6(1):46–50.

5. Narayanasamy R., Rathnamani V. Performance evaluation of equity mutual funds (on selected equity large cap funds). International Journal of Business and Management Invention. 2013;(4):18–24.

6. Annapoorna M. S., Gupta P.K. A comparative analysis of returns of mutual fund schemes ranked 1 by CRISIL. Tactful Management Research Journal. 2013;2(1):1–6.

7. Sarkar S. Performance evaluation of ESG funds in India — a study. The Management Accountant Journal. 2022;57(3):40–47. DOI: 10.33516/maj.v57i3.40–47p

8. Manoj S., Avinash B. Performance evaluation of mutual funds before and during the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in India. European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine. 2020;7(8):2286–2305.

9. Bhuva K. K., Bantwa A. Risk, return & performance evaluation of selected mutual fund schemes — a study on large & mid cap funds. Journal of Management and Science. 2012;1(4):348–362. DOI: 10.26524/jms.2012.44

10. Treynor J. How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review. 1965;43(1):63–75.

11. Sharpe W. F. Adjusting for risk in portfolio performance measurement. The Journal of Portfolio Management. 1975;1(2):29–34. DOI: 10.3905/jpm.1975.408513

12. Fama E. F. Components of investment performance. The Journal of Finance. 1972;27(3):551–567. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–6261.1972.tb00984.x

13. Muthappan P.K., Damodharan E. Risk-adjusted performance of Indian mutual funds schemes. Finance India. 2006;20(3):965–978.

14. Deb S. G., Banerjee A., Chakrabarti B. B. Persistence in performance of Indian equity mutual funds: An empirical investigation. IIMB Management Review. 2008;20(2):172–187. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2441547

15. Agrawal D., Patidar D. A comparative study of equity based mutual fund of reliance and HDFC. Prabandhan&Taqniki. 2009;3:145–154.

16. Nimalathasan B., Gandhi R. K. Mutual fund financial performance analysis — a comparative study on equity diversified schemes and equity mid-cap schemes. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies. 2012;2(3):91–106.

17. Yadav J. S., Yadav O.S. The Indian stock market: A comparative study of mutual funds and foreign institutional investors. Indian Journal of Finance. 2012;6(9):45–53.

18. Somashekar T. S. Mutual fund regulation in India — assessing its benefits. International Lawyer. 2009;43(4):1451–1468. URL: https://scholar.smu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1314&context=til

19. Dunna M. Mutual funds in India — issues, opportunities and challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Management Review. 2012;1(2):240–249.

20. D’Silva B., D’Silva S., Bhuptani R. S. A study on factors influencing mutual fund investment in India. Research Journal of Commerce Research and Behavioural Sciences. 2012;1(5):23–30.

21. Prajapati K. P., Patel M. K. Comparative study on performance evaluation of mutual fund schemes of Indian companies. Researchers World. 2012;3(3):47–59.

22. Pal S., Chandani A. A critical analysis of selected mutual funds in India. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2014;11:481–494. DOI: 10.1016/S2212–5671(14)00214–7

23. Karrupasamy R., Vanaja V. Performance evaluation of selected category of public sector mutual fund schemes in India. International Research Journal of Business and Management. 2014;1:1–9.

24. Shukla S. A comparative performance evolution of selected mutual funds. International Journal of Science Technology & Management. 2015;4(2):140–149. URL: https://www.ijstm.com/images/short_pdf/M026.pdf

25. Murthy J., Anjaneyulu M. S.R., Bhatt H., Kumar D. S. Performance evaluation of mutual funds: A study on selected equity mutual funds In India. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 2022;6(9):1124–1132.

26. Mamta, Ojha S. C. Performance evaluation of mutual funds: A study of selected equity diversified mutual funds in India. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Business Management. 2017;5(11):1–8.

27. Alagappan S. M. Performance evaluation of mutual funds in India. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 2019;6(6):229–236. URL: https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1906F39.pdf

28. Yue X. G., Han Y., Teresiene D., Merkyte J., Liu W. Sustainable funds’ performance evaluation. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):8034. DOI: 10.3390/su12198034

29. Naffa H., Fain M. Performance measurement of ESG-themed megatrend investments in global equity markets using pure factor portfolios methodology. PloS One. 2020;15(12): e0244225. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244225

30. Sharma A., Adhana D. A study on performance evaluation of equity share and mutual funds. Novyi Mir Research Journal. 2020;5(9):45–75. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344450702_A_Study_on_Performance_Evaluation_of_Equity_Share_and_Mutual_Funds

31. Nandini G. Performance evaluation of select mutual fund schemes in India — a comparative study. Adarsh Journal of Management Research. 2014;7(2):1–8. DOI: 10.21095/ajmr/2014/v7/i2/88283

32. Malviya M., Khanna P. Performance of mutual fund industry in India. International Journal of All Research Writings. 2020;2(11):66–76. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344664913_PERFORMANCE_OF_MUTUAL_FUND_INDUSTRY_IN_INDIA

33. Jensen M. C. Risk, the pricing of capital assets, and the evaluation of investment portfolios. The Journal of Business. 1969;42(2):167–247.


Review

For citations:


Anvekar R., Patil S. Circular Economy Goals, Large Capitalisation, and ESG Funds: An Investment Perspective. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(2):206-218. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-2-206-218

Views: 564


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)