Bitcoin, Altcoins, Digital Ruble: On the Economic Nature of Cryptocurrencies

Cryptocurrencies are a type of financial instrument that has been widely used by financial market participants since the early 2010s. Despite their growing popularity, their status within financial systems across different countries remains a topic of ongoing discussion. There is still no consensus on how to best understand the economic nature of these digital assets. This paper uses discourse analysis and content analysis to explore the various interpretations of cryptocurrencies’ economic nature. The paper argues that the interpretation of cryptocurrency’s economic nature depends heavily on the perspective of the stakeholder and the intended purpose of using the term. It considers arguments both for and against treating cryptocurrencies as commodities, currencies (including electronic and private currencies), or properties (assets, such as financial assets). It concludes that traditional cryptocurrencies do not meet the criteria for being considered money, and only central bank-issued digital currencies can fulfill all the functions associated with money. Decentralized cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, cannot be classified as securities because there are no companies or organizations that issue these assets and bear any obligations under them. Instead, these assets have the characteristics of commodities. Different types of cryptocurrencies can be treated as either commodities or securities for tax purposes, depending on the specific circumstances. At the same time, assets with unique characteristics and behavior in the financial market may be included in a separate category for accounting purposes, or if the state allows for the use of cryptocurrencies in transactions without restrictions, they can be considered equivalent to cash.

1. Belousov Yu.V. Bitcoin and forms of money: Theoretical issues. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2024;16(2):126-141. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2024-2-126-141

2. Varnavskiy A.V. Token money or cryptocurrency: Technological content and economic essence. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2018;22(5):122-140. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2018-22-5-122-140

3. Gorbacheva T.A. Stablecoins as a new word in the cryptocurrency market. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2022;14(1):126-139. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2022-1-126-139

4. Chaudhuri R.R. The free banking era. In: The changing face of American banking. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014:7-19. DOI: 10.1057/9781137361219_2

5. Hayek F.A. Denationalization of money: An analysis of the theory and practice of concurrent currencies. London: Institute of Economic Affairs; 1976. 108 p. (Russ. ed.: Hayek F. Chastnye den’gi. Moscow: The Institute of National Economy Model; 1996. 112 p.).

6. Chaum D. Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In: Chaum D., Rivest R.L., Sherman A.T., eds. Advances in cryptology. Boston, MA: Springer; 1983:199-203. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0602-4_18

7. Luther W.J., Salter A.W. Bitcoin and the bailout. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2017;66:50-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2017.01.009

8. Chowdhury E.K., Abdullah M.N. Gauging demand for cryptocurrency over the economic policy uncertainty and stock market volatility. Computational Economics. 2023;64(1):37-55. DOI: 10.1007/s10614-023-10423-1

9. Kolganov A.I. What is money? Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2022;(1):17-28. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2022-1(96)-17-28

10. Hewitt E. Bringing continuity to cryptocurrency: Commercial law as a guide to the asset categorization of Bitcoin. Seattle University Law Review. 2016;39(2):619-640. URL: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2319&context=sulr

11. Sinel’nikova-Muryleva E.V., Shilov K.D., Zubarev A.V. The essence of cryptocurrencies: Descriptive and comparative analysis. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2019;23(6):36-49. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-6-36-49

12. Schaub M., Phares H.B. Cryptocurrency value changes in response to national elections: Do they behave like money or commodities? Applied Economics Letters. 2020;27(14):1135-1140. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2019.1673297

13. Rehman M.U., Apergis N. Determining the predictive power between cryptocurrencies and real time commodity futures: Evidence from quantile causality tests. Resources Policy. 2019;61:603-616. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.08.015

14. Selmi R., Mensi W., Hammoudeh S., Bouoiyour J. Is Bitcoin a hedge, a safe haven or a diversifier for oil price movements? A comparison with gold. Energy Economics. 2018;74:787-801. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.007

15. Manavi S.A., Jafari G., Rouhani S., Ausloos M. Demythifying the belief in cryptocurrencies decentralized aspects. A study of cryptocurrencies time cross-correlations with common currencies, commodities and financial indices. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2020;556:124759. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124759

16. Holovatiuk O. Cryptocurrencies as an asset class in portfolio optimization. Central European Economic Journal. 2020;7(54):33-55. DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2020-0004

17. Low G., Tan T. Cryptocurrency — is it property? Journal of Investment Compliance. 2020;21(2-3):175-179. DOI: 10.1108/JOIC-09-2020-027

18. Kinlaw W., Kritzman M.P., Turkington D. A practitioner’s guide to asset allocation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017. 256 p.

19. Bazán-Palomino W. Interdependence, contagion and speculative bubbles in cryptocurrency markets. Finance Research Letters. 2022;49:103132. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103132

20. Shilov K.D., Zubarev A.V. Evolution of Bitcoin as a financial asset. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2021;25(5):150- 171. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-4-150-171

21. Klarin A. The decade-long cryptocurrencies and the blockchain rollercoaster: Mapping the intellectual structure and charting future directions. Research in International Business and Finance. 2020;51:101067. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101067

22. Gautam S., Kumar P. A study of the evolutionary trends in blockchain and cryptocurrency: A bibliometric approach. In: Taneja S., Kumar P., Sood K., Özen E., Grima S., eds. Finance analytics in business. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2024:251-266. (Emerald Studies in Finance, Insurance, and Risk Management). DOI: 10.1108/978-1-83753-572-920241013

23. Pattnaik D., Hassan M.K., Dsouza A. Tiwari A., Devji S. Ex-post facto analysis of cryptocurrency literature over a decade using bibliometric technique. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2023;189:122339. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122339

24. Tusset G. How the cryptocurrency discourse is changing: A textual analysis. History of Economic Thought and Policy. 2023(2):31-52. DOI: 10.3280/SPE2023-002002

25. Volkova O.N. Defining the boundaries of an economic discipline: A content-related approach (the case of Accounting). Voprosy ekonomiki. 2018;(2):95-121. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2018-2-95-121