Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

The Impact of Investment Behavior and Risk Appetite on Investment Decisions of Rural Investors

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-3-230-242

Abstract

The research aims to investigate the impact of investment behavior and risk appetite on investment decision-making for rural investors, with frequent analysis of the demographic characteristics of rural investors. The research was based on a cross-sectional research design in which the data was collected from the rural areas of Haryana and Punjab; 486 individual investors’ data was collected using structured questionnaires from all 22 districts of Haryana and seven districts of Punjab. Frequency analysis of the demographic characteristics has been performed using SPSS version 26. For testing the reliability and validity of the questionnaire, the Cronbach alpha test, Composite reliability, and Discriminant validity and hypothesis testing have been done using Structural Equation Modelling [SEM] with Smart PLS 4. The results of the study reveal that investment behavior has a significant impact on investment decision-making. This implies that rural investors make decisions based on their behavioral aspects, i. e., needs, objectives, the history of particular assets. The results also show that risk appetite does not significantly affect the decision-making process of rural investors, implying that regardless of its level, it is not the major factor in investment decision-making.

About the Authors

B. Singh
Lovely Professional University
India

Bhawandeep Singh — Research Scholar at Mittal School of Business

Phagwara


Competing Interests:

The authors have no confl icts of interest to declare.



. Rekha
Lovely Professional University
India

Rekha — PhD, Prof. in the Finance and Banking Department of Mittal School of Business

Phagwara


Competing Interests:

The authors have no confl icts of interest to declare.



S. Sharma
Lovely Professional University
India

Swaty Sharma — PhD, Assis. Prof. in the Finance and Banking Department of Mittal School of Business

Phagwara


Competing Interests:

The authors have no confl icts of interest to declare.



References

1. Raut R. K., Kumar R., Das N. Individual investors’ intention towards SRI in India: An implementation of the theory of reasoned action. Social Responsibility Journal. 2021;17(7):877-896. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-02-2018-0052

2. Mittal S. K. Behavior biases and investment decision: Theoretical and research framework. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets. 2022;14(2):213-228. DOI: 10.1108/QRFM-09-2017-0085

3. Manocha S. , Bhullar P. S. , Gupta P. K. Exploring the determinants of investment behavior: Evidence from agrarian investor class of India. Business Perspectives and Research. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/22785337231156659

4. Balon R. An explanation of generations and generational changes: Generations. The real differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents — and what they mean for America’s future. Jean M. Twenge; Atria Books; New York; 2023; ISBN 9781982181611; p 554. Academic Psychiatry. 2024;48(3):280-282. DOI: 10.1007/s40596-023-01921-3

5. Lokhande M. A. A study of investment awareness and patterns of savings and investments by rural investors. Indian Journal of Finance. 2015;9(7):22-31. DOI: 10.17010/ijf/2015/v9i7/72351

6. Sussman R., Gifford R. Causality in the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2019;45(6):920-933. DOI: 10.1177/0146167218801363

7. Albarracin D., Shavitt S. Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology. 2018;69:299-327. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911

8. Adil M., Singh Y., Ansari M. S. How financial literacy moderate the association between behaviour biases and investment decision? Asian Journal of Accounting Research. 2022;7(1):17-30. DOI: 10.1108/AJAR-09-2020-0086

9. Sarkar A. K., Sahu T. N. Demographic factors, awareness, perceived risk attitude and investment behaviour — A discussion. In: Sarkar A. K., Sahu T. N. Investment behaviour: Towards an individual-centred financial policy in developing economies. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2018:9-20. DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78756-279-020181002

10. Katper N. K., Azam M., Karim N. A., Zia S. Z. Behavioral biases and investors’ decision-making: The moderating role of socio-demographic variables. International Journal of Financial Engineering. 2019;6(3):19500208. DOI: 10.1142/s2424786319500208

11. Merter A. K., Balcıoğlu Y. S. Financial literacy and decision-making: The impact of knowledge gaps on financial outcomes. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2025;25(S1):101-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2025.07.010

12. Mohta A., Shunmugasundaram V. Moderating role of millennials’ financial literacy on the relationship between risk tolerance and risky investment behavior: Evidence from India. International Journal of Social Economics. 2024;51(3):422-440. DOI: 10.1108/IJSE-12-2022-0812

13. Mishra M., Mishra S. Financial risk tolerance among Indian investors: A multiple discriminant modeling of determinants. Strategic Change. 2016;25(5):485-500. DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2075

14. Sharma M., Nanda S., Gupta S. A systematic review of investment confidence, risk appetite and dependence status of women. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s13198-024-02295-x

15. Berthalia F., Mareta N., Amanda L., Julia J. Analysis of the influence of capital market level, mindset, and minimum capital on investment interest of Bangka Belitung University students with investment risk as moderating variable. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research. 2023;4(7):2243-2254. DOI: 10.11594/ijmaber.04.07.08

16. Mundi H. S., Kumar D. The potential of alternative investments as an asset class: A thematic and bibliometric review. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets. 2022;15(1):119-141. DOI: 10.1108/QRFM-11-2021-0182

17. Parsai P., Chandok A. K. The role of financial literacy in investment decision-making: A review. International Journal of Innovations in Science, Engineering and Management. 2025;4(1):296-301. DOI: 10.69968/ijisem.2025v4i1296-301

18. Sun J., Pellegrini M. M., Dabić M., Wang K., Wang C. Family ownership and control as drivers for environmental, social, and governance in family firms. Review of Managerial Science. 2024;18(4):1015- 1046. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-023-00631-2

19. Rahayu S. M., Worokinasih S., Damayanti C. R., et al. The road to financial resilient: Testing digital financial literacy and saving behavior. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(3):218-230. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-3-218-230

20. Rastogi S., Gupta S. Development of scale to measure objectives-oriented investment behavior. Journal of Behavioral Finance. 2020;21(3):301-310. DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2019.1692346

21. Kannadhasan M. Retail investors’ financial risk tolerance and their risk-taking behaviour: The role of demographics as differentiating and classifying factors. IIMB Management Review. 2015;27(3):175-184. DOI: 10.1016/j.iimb.2015.06.004

22. Sarwar A., Afaf G. A comparison between psychological and economic factors affecting individual investor’s decision-making behavior. Cogent Business & Management. 2016;3(1):1232907. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2016.1232907

23. Thakkar J. J. Structural equation modelling: Application for research and practice. Singapore: Springer; 2020. 140 p. (Studies in systems, decision and control. Vol. 285). DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-3793-6

24. Marinelli N., Mazzoli C., Palmucci F. How does gender really affect investment behavior? Economics Letters. 2017;151:58-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.006

25. Charles M. A., Kasilingam D. R. Does the investor’s age influence their investment behaviour? Paradigm. 2013;17(1-2):11-24. DOI: 10.1177/0971890720130103

26. Hair J. F., Jr., Sarstedt M., Matthews L. M., Ringle C. M. Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I — method. European Business Review. 2016;28(1):63-76. DOI: 10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094

27. Hair J. F., Ringle C. M., Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 2011;19(2):139-152. DOI: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

28. Ab Hamid M. R., Sami W., Mohmad Sidek M. H. Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2017;890:012163. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163

29. Hair J. F., Risher J. J., Sarstedt M., Ringle C. M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 2019;31(1):2-24. DOI: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

30. Mak M. K., Ip W. H. An exploratory study of investment behaviour of investors. International Journal of Engineering Business Management. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1847979017711520

31. Ratnawati K. Decoding the mind of investors: A systematic literature review on investment decisionmaking. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2026;30(1):228-241. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-1-228-241


Review

For citations:


Singh B., Rekha , Sharma S. The Impact of Investment Behavior and Risk Appetite on Investment Decisions of Rural Investors. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2026;30(3):230-242. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-3-230-242

Views: 193

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)