CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF ANTICORRUPTION COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS AT SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES
Abstract
Fighting corruption is one of the most important tasks facing all countries. Currently the RF state institutes have made significant efforts to remedy the situation including passing several anti-corruption legislative acts. Some Russian companies must also comply with applicable foreign laws. Such as to anti-corruption legislation of the USA and the UK. If you compare the requirements of the Russian and international anti-corruption legislation, it appears that the Russian anti-corruption legislation is largely harmonized with relevant international law. Now the enforcement of existing legislation is the main challenge of Russian authorities and enterprises. The main actions are issued in the National Anticorruption Plan for 2014–2015. One of the actions of the National Plan is the assignment given to the business communities to monitor the implementation of anti-corruption compliance in companies. Quality monitoring requires criteria by which one can estimate the effectiveness of the anti-corruption activities in a company. Special attention requires the evaluation of anti-corruption compliance in small and medium-sized enterprises (SME). The basic principles, which must meet the criteria for the evaluation of anti-corruption compliance, are proposed in this article. Applying these principles (consistency, adaptability and reasonable sufficiency), we can reduce the number of anti-corruption measures down to 23 in 10 business processes. The principle of ease of running gives 8 criteria for 10 business processes for verification of anticorruption compliance programs at SME.
About the Authors
G. CrouseRussian Federation
Partner
L. A. Chaldaeva
Russian Federation
ScD (Economics), Professor, Head of the Economics of Organization Chair
A. A. Kilyachkov
Russian Federation
PhD (Engineering), Manager
References
1. Crouse G., Novikov A.V. Antikorruptsionnyi komplaens na predpriiatiiakh malogo i srednego biznesa [Anticorruption compliance for small and medium business enterprises]. Materialy mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo kongressa, Moskva, Finansovyi universitet. 25–26 iiunia 2013 g. — Proceedings of the International Scientific Congress. Moscow, the Financial University, 25–26 June, 2013. (In Russ.)
2. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po razrabotke i priniatiiu organizatsiiami mer po preduprezhdeniiu i protivodeistviiu korruptsii [Methodological recommendations for development and adoption of measures to prevent and combat corruption]. URL: http://www.dorkomi. ru/about/against_corruption/methodical_recommendations.pdf (access as of 15.09.2014). (In Russ.)
3. Natsional’nyi plan protivodeistviia korruptsii na 2014–2015 gg. [The National Anti-Corruption Plan for 2014–2015]. (in Russ.) URL: http://www.consultant.ru/ document/cons_doc_LAW_161699/ (access as of 15.09.2014).
4. O protivodeistvii korruptsii. Federal’nyi zakon ot 25 dekabria 2008 g. № 273-FZ [On Combating Corruption. Federal Law of 25 December 2008, no. 273-FZ]. URL: http://fssprus.ru/law9/ (access as of 15.09.2014). (In Russ.)
5. The Bribery Act 2010. URL: http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/23/pdfs/ ukpga_20100023_en.pdf (access as of 18.09.2014).
6. The 2010 UK Bribery Act. Adequate Procedures. Guidance on good practice procedures for corporate anti-bribery programs. URL: http://www.navigant. com/~/media/WWW/site/downloads/ disputes%20investigations/uk_bribery_ act_what_are_adequate_procedures_article%20final.ashx (access as of 18.09.2014).
7. The 2010 UK Bribery Act Adequate Procedures. Guidance on good practice procedures for corporate anti-bribery programs. Transparence International, July 2010. URL: http://www.justice. gov.uk/downloads/legislation/briberyact-2010-guidance.pdf (access as of 18.09.2014).
8. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: 15 U.S.C. § § 78dd-1, 78dd-2, 78dd-3, 78m, 78 ff.
9. A Resource Guide to the U. S. Corrupt Practices Act by the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Enforcement Division of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, November, 2012.
10. Straub/Steffen District Court Personal Jurisdiction and U.S. — Nexus Rulings: Good News and Bad News for Foreign Individual FCPA Defendants. FCPA Update, February 2013, Vol. 4. No 7. Pp. 1–13.
11. Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff, Versus Elek Straub, et al., Defendants. Memorandum and Order, February 8, 2013. United States District Court Southern District of New York, No 11 Civ. 9645 (RJS), Pp. 1–22.
12. Berezanskii V.V., Kiliachkov A.A. Novye trebovaniia rossiiskogo zakonodatel’stva k antikorruptsionnomu komplaensu [The new Russian legislation requirements for the anticorruption compliance]. Vnutrennii kontrol» v kreditnoi organizatsii — Internal control at a credit institution, 2014, no. 2 (22). (In Russ.) 13.
13. Berezanskii V. V., Kiliachkov A. A. Chem mozhet obernut’sia eksterritorial’nost» zakona SShA o protivodeistvii korruptsii [What can become of the extraterritoriality of the US FCPA?]. Vnutrennii kontrol» v kreditnoi organizatsi — Internal control at a credit institution, 2014, no. 3 (22). (In Russ.)
14. Federal’nyi zakon ot 24 iiulia 2007 g. N 209-FZ «O razvitii malogo i srednego predprinimatel’stva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Federal law No. 209-FZ, July 24, 2007, «On the development of small and medium-size enterprises in the Russian Federation», article 4]. (In Russ.)
15. Transparency International. Corruption Perception Index, 2012. URL: http://www. transparency.org/cpi2012/results (access as of 18.09.2014).
16. Transparency International. Corruption Perception Index, 2013. URL: http://www. transparency.org/cpi2013/results (access as of 18.09.2014).
17. Antikorruptsionnaia khartiia rossiiskogo biznesa [Anticorruption Charter of Russian Business]. URL: http://rspp.ru/simplepage/455 (access as of 18.09.2014). (In Russ.)
18. Rossiiskii Komplaens Al’ians [The Russian Compliance Alliance]. URL: http://www.ethicsrussia.org/ru/index.php? Itemid=206&option=com_zoo&view =category (access as of 18.09.2014). (In Russ.)
19. Chaldaeva L.A., Kiliachkov A.A., Siva kov O.G. Rol» biznes soobshchestva v bor’be s korruptsiei [The role of the business community in the fight against corruption]. Finansy i kredit — Finances and Credit, 2014, no. 41 (617). (In Russ.)
20. Chaldaeva L.A., Kiliachkov A.A. Strateg i i a ekonom i che skoi st abi l i z at s i i : rol» gosudarstva, obshchestvennogo i predprinimatel’skogo soobshchestva // Finansovaia analitika. 2013. № 33 (171). (In Russ.)
21. Chaldaeva L.A., Kiliachkov A.A. Sistema protivodeistviia korruptsii: pravovye normy i mezhdunarodnye praktiki. [The anticorruption system: the rule of law and international practices]. Rossiia: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiia. Ezhegodnik. Vyp. 8 — Russia: Trends and Prospects. Yearbook. Vol. 8. URL: http://pandia. org/text/78/324/23267.php (access as of 18.09.2014). (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Crouse G., Chaldaeva L.A., Kilyachkov A.A. CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF ANTICORRUPTION COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS AT SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2014;(6):101-109.