EVALUATION AND CHOICE OF FORMS OF STATE REGULATION OF INTENSIFICATION OF ECONOMIC GROWTH

Relevance. Today, every state considers the problem of economic growth is the key, and in modern conditions of globalization and integration processes, the occurrence of crisis situations, increasing the likelihood of risks, limited natural resources, growing global competition, this problem is of fundamental importance. These tendencies also bring to the fore the necessity of choosing the most optimal forms of state regulation, ensuring the rational combination of market mechanisms and administrative interference in the economy.

Purpose. Development of theoretical provisions and identification of the main directions of the evolution of the state regulations forms of intensification of economic growth on the basis of a comprehensive assessment of their impact on the economy.

Methods. As a methodological basis of research were used methods of systematization, structuring of information, correlation and regression analysis, a system approach.

Results. The article shows that state regulation of economy in market conditions is a necessary system of standard measures of legislative, executive and supervisory nature performed by the competent state bodies and public organizations in order to stabilize and adapt the existing socio-economic system to changing conditions. On the basis of systematization and generalization of theoretical and practical aspects of state regulation in Russia and in foreign countries we identified trends and patterns of state regulation of the intensification of regional economic growth, assessed their impact using the author’s method of regression analysis that allowed to identify the priority forms of state regulation. The approach proposed in the article for identification of the relationship between the resultant indicators of state regulation and the factor indicators that affected the results. It allows us to determine primary tools of macro-regulation.

Conclusions. Our research demonstrates the need to implement various forms of state regulation in existing conditions of growing crisis trends, globalization, and geopolitical tensions. The preferable direction of state regulation is the intensification of economic growth — the fundamental factor of economic security and global competitiveness.

1. Tyukavkin N. M. Questions of state regulation of economy of subjects of the regional economy. Osnovy EUP = Basics EUP, 2014, no. 2 (14), pp. 8–10. (In Russ.).

2. Gorbov V. A. State policy in the sphere of crisis regulation of the economy. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya = Bulletin of state and municipal management, 2013, no. 2, pp. 134–140. (In Russ.).

3. Ryakhovskaya A. N. State regulation of economy: risks and prospects. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie) = MID (Modernization. Innovation. Development), 2015, no. 1 (21), pp. 31–36. (In Russ.).

4. Mokina S. L., Nikitina E. G. The necessity of state regulation of the economy. Vestnik SamGU = Bulletin of SamGU, 2015, no. 2 (124), pp. 153–157. (In Russ.).

5. Ermolik A. V., Leonidov A. I. The taxes as an instrument of state regulation of the economy. Aktual’nye problemy aviatsii i kosmonavtiki = Actual problems of aviation and cosmonautics, 2013, no. 9, pp. 318–320. (In Russ.).

6. Porter M. What is the strategy? Harvard Business Review, 1996, no. 74 (6), pp. 61–78.

7. Solow R. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956, no. 70, рр. 65–94.

8. Luukkonen J. The Europeanization of regional development: Local strategies and European spatial visions in Northern Finland. Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography, 2011, no. 93 (3), pp. 253–270.

9. Shrivastava P. Is strategic management ideological? Journal of Management, 1986, no. 12 (3), pp. 363–377.

10. Zhang X., Zhang K. How does globalization affect regional inequality within a developing country? Evidence from China. Journal of Development Studies, 2003, no. 39, рр. 47–67.

11. Atkinson R., Garner L. Regulation as Industrial Policy: A Case Study of the U. S. Auto Industry. Economic Development Quarterly, 1987, no. 1 (4), pp. 358–373.

12. Santerre R. E., Vernon J. A. Assessing Consumer Gains from a Drug Price Control Policy in the United States. Southern Economic Journal, 2006, no. 73(1), pp. 233–245.

13. Vaara E., Whittington R. Strategy as practice: Taking social practices seriously. Academy of Management Annals, 2012, no. 6 (1), pp. 285–336.

14. Shmatkova E. M. Foreign experience of state regulation of the economy. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy = Socio-economic phenomena and processes, 2013, no. 9 (055), pp. 116–121. (In Russ.).

15. Goman I. V., Egorova A. V. Competition and state regulation of economy of the Russian Federation. Vestnik SamGU = Bulletin of SamGU, 2015, no. 2 (124), pp. 116–122. (In Russ.).

16. Whittington R. Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 2006, no. 27 (5), pp. 613–634.

17. Paytas J. Does Governance Matter? The Dynamics of Metropolitan Governance and Competitiveness. Carnegie-Mellon University, Center for Economic Development, 2001. 15 p.

18. Kanevcev M. V., Popov A. L. The basic functions of state regulation of economy in the social state. Simvol nauki = Symbol of science, 2015, no. 7–1, pp. 80–82. (In Russ.).

19. Kriushkina O. V. State regulation of the economy to eliminate the consequences of the economic crisis in Russia. Osnovy EUP = Basics EUP, 2013, no. 2 (8), pp. 31–34. (In Russ.).

20. Nitovkin D. V. The role and place of state regulation in managing the economy. Nauchnyi zhurnal KubGAU = Scientific Journal of KubSAU, 2013, no. 93, pp. 1207–1216. (In Russ.).

21. Strategy‑2020: New growth’s model — new social policy. Final report on the results of expert work on actual problems of the socio-economic strategy of Russia for the period up to 2020. Book 1. V. A. Mau & Ya. I. Kuzminov (Eds.). Moscow: Publishing house “Delo”, 2013. 430 p. (In Russ.).