Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Current State and Development Trends of blockchain Technology in the Financial Sector

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-6-26-35

Abstract

The article analyzes the main reasons for the slow adoption of blockchain technology, in particular, in the financial sector. The authors critically analyzed the main declared properties of blockchain technologies: trust, security, decentralization, immutable data storage, lack of intermediaries, hardware protection against attacks, and openness. The aim of the study are to show that these blockchain properties are overestimated, the expectations of its adoption are inflated, and the delays in its adaptation outside of cryptocurrencies, in particular, in the financial sector, are natural. The article is based on a methodology for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of scientific publications and statistical sources on the blockchain adaptation from the perspective of the theory of diffusion of innovations, the conditions and the specifics of economic and sociological approaches for consensus-building. The study resulted in the following new systemic findings. Blockchain and distributed ledgers are not fundamentally new technologies. In general, they do not have the properties of the immutable data storage, trust, anonymity, low transaction and adoption costs. All current consensus technologies have fundamental faults. Cryptocurrency technology is original, but it was a private experimental solution to a specific ideological problem of the libertarian political agenda. Consensus does not provide trust. Delayed blockchain adoption, in particular in traditional financial institutions, is natural, since the technology does not show better results than current digital solutions, and traditional economic institutions have greater public trust. The practical implications of the findings are that they may be used by investors.

About the Authors

G. O. Krylov
Financial University; National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
Russian Federation

Grigorii O. Krylov — Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Cand. Sci. (Engin.), Cand. Sci. (Juris.), Professor, Department of Information Security

Professor

Honorary Figure of Russian Higher Education



V. M. Seleznev
JSC LatCard
Latvia
Vladimir M. Seleznev — Cand. Sci. (Engin.), MBM, Member of the Board (Electronic money financial institution)


References

1. Autore D.M., Clarke N., Jiang D. Bitcoin speculation or value creation? Corporate Blockchain investments and stock market reactions. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2019. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3385162

2. Tapscott D., Tapscott A. Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is changing the world. New York: Portfolio; 2018. 432 p.

3. Swan M.Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.; 2015. 152 p.

4. Mougayar W.The business Blockchain: Promise, practice, and application of the next Internet technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2016. 209 p.

5. Fanning K., Centers D.P.Blockchain and its coming impact on financial services. The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 2016;27(5):53–57. DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.22179

6. Hassani H., Huang X., Silva E. Banking with Blockchain-ed big data. Journal of Management Analytics. 2018;5(4):256– 275. DOI: 0.1080/23270012.2018.1528900

7. Iansiti M., Lakhani K.R. The truth about Blockchain. Harvard Business Review. 2017;95(1):118–127. URL: https://enterprisersproject.com/sites/default/files/the_truth_about_blockchain.pdf

8. McGrath R.G. The pace of technology adoption is speeding up. Harvard Business Review. 2013;(Nov.). URL: https://hbr.org/2013/11/the-pace-of-technology-adoption-is-speeding-up.

9. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York, London: The Free Press; 1983.

10. Woodside J.M., Augustine F.K. Jr., Giberson W. Blockchain technology adoption status and strategies. Journal of International Technology and Information Management. 2017;26(2). URL: http://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1300&context=jitim (accessed on 10.10.2019).

11. Stratopoulos T.C., Wang V.X. Blockchain technology adoption. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ ssrn.3188470

12. Ahuja G., Lampert C.M. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough invention. Strategic Management Journal. 2001;22(6–7):521–543. DOI: 10.1002/smj.176

13. Lamport L., Shostak R., Pease M.The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems. 1982;4(3):382–401. DOI: 10.1145/357172.357176

14. Fischer M., Lynch N., Paterson M.Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. Journal of the ACM. 1985;32(2):374–382. DOI: 10.1145/3149.214121

15. Ben-Or M., Hassidim A. Fast quantum Byzantine agreement. In: STOC’05. Proc. 37th Annu. ACM symp. on theory of computing (Baltimore, MD, May 22–24, 2005). New York: ACM; 2005:481–485. DOI: 10.1145/1060590.1060662

16. Krawisz D. The proof-of-work concept. Satoshi Nakamoto Institute. 2013. URL: https://nakamotoinstitute.org/ mempool/the-proof-of-work-concept/ (accessed on 10.10.2019).

17. Bissias G., Levine B.N., Ozisik A.P., Andresen G.An analysis of attacks on Blockchain consensus. URL: https://arxiv. org/pdf/1610.07985.pdf (accessed on 10.10.2019).

18. Zhang S., Lee J.-H. Double-spending with a Sybil attack in the Bitcoin decentralized network. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2019;15(10):5715–5722. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2019.2921566

19. Demeester T.Critique of Buterin’s “A proof of stake design philosophy”. Medium. 2017. URL: https://medium.com/@ tuurdemeester/critique-of-buterins-a-proof-of-stakedesign-philosophy-49fc9ebb36c6 (accessed on 10.10.2019).

20. Zhang S., Lee J.-H. Analysis of the main consensus protocols of Blockchain. ICT Express. 2019;5(3). DOI: 10.1016/j. icte.2019.08.001

21. Wahab A., Memood W. Survey of consensus protocols. 2018. URL: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1810/1810.03357. pdf (accessed on 10.10.2019).

22. Grewal-CarrV., Marshall S.Blockchain: Enigma. Paradox. Opportunity. Deloitte. 2016. URL: https://www2.deloitte. com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/Innovation/deloitte-uk-blockchain-full-report.pdf (accessed on 10.10.2019).

23. Stolfi J. Letter to the Editor, NIST Reports. Ref: NISTIR 8202 (DRAFT): Blockchain Technology Overview. 2018. URL: https://www.ic.unicamp.br/~stolfi/temp/nist-report-review.pdf (accessed on 10.10.2019).

24. Radoccia S.What’s holding Blockchain back from large-scale adoption? Forbes. Sept. 21, 2017. URL: https://www.forbes. com/sites/quora/2017/09/21/whats-holding-blockchain-back-from-large-scale-adoption (accessed on 10.10.2019).

25. Castillo M. The DAO attacked: Code issue leads to $ 60 million ether theft. Coindesk. June 18, 2016. URL: https://www.coindesk.com/dao-attacked-code-issue-leads-60-million-ether-theft (accessed on 10.10.2019).

26. Karlstrøm H. Do libertarians dream of electric coins? The material embeddedness of Bitcoin. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2016;15(1):23–36. DOI: 10.1080/1600910x.2013.870083

27. Krylov G.O., Lisitsyn A.Y., Polyakov L.I. Comparative analysis of volatility of cryptocurrencies and fiat money. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2018; 22(2):66–89. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671– 2018–22–2–66–89

28. Goswami S. Scalability analysis of Blockchains through Blockchain simulation. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 2017;(2976). URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/108f/9d7493fecd7cdb1a 2a123d89a4db16b79679.pdf?_ga=2.210275989.1023187009.1572354254–1709531060.1571930732 (accessed on 10.10.2019).

29. Truby J. Decarbonizing Bitcoin: Law and policy choices for reducing the energy consumption of Blockchain technologies and digital currencies. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018;44:399–410. DOI: 10.1016/j. erss.2018.06.009

30. Bloomberg J. Don’t let Blockchain cost savings hype fool you. Forbes. Feb. 24, 2018. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbloomberg/2018/02/24/dont-let-blockchain-cost-savings-hype-fool-you/#3b47f4f45811 (accessed on 10.10.2019).

31. Davis S. Likens S.Blockchain is here. What’s your next move? Pw C. 2018. URL: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/ blockchain/blockchain-in-business.html (accessed on 10.10.2019).

32. Bohannon J.Why criminals can’t hide behind Bitcoin. Science. March 09, 2016. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf4167

33. Halaburda H. Blockchain revolution without the Blockchain? Communications of the ACM. 2018;61(7):27–29. DOI: 10.1145/3225619

34. Stinchcombe K. Blockchain is not only crappy technology but a bad vision for the future. Medium. Apr. 5, 2018. URL: https://medium.com/@kaistinchcombe/decentralized-and-trustless-crypto-paradise-is-actually-amedievalhellhole-c1ca122efdec (accessed on 10.10.2019).

35. Albrecht S., Lutz B., Neumann D. How sentiment impacts the success of Blockchain startupsAn analysis of social media data and initial coin offerings. In: Proc. 52nd Hawaii int. conf. on system sciences. 2019:4545–4554. URL: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/59892/ 0452. pdf (accessed on 10.10.2019).

36. Lee C.C., Kriscenski J.C., Lim H.S.An empirical study of behavioral intention to use Blockchain technology. Journal of International Business Disciplines. 2019;14(1):1–21. URL: https://faculty.utrgv.edu/louis.falk/jibd/JIBDmay19.pdf (accessed on 10.10.2019).


Review

For citations:


Krylov G.O., Seleznev V.M. Current State and Development Trends of blockchain Technology in the Financial Sector. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2019;23(6):26-35. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-6-26-35

Views: 2847


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)