EAEU Countries Foreign Trade Policy: Results of Simulation Modeling

The authors examine the impact of foreign trade on the development of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The relevance of the study is related to the role of foreign trade in the integration processes of the EAEU countries. The purpose of the study is to identify, on the basis of a modified gravity model of international trade, the possible contribution of changes in the foreign trade policy of the EAEU countries to the growth of their foreign trade. The authors apply a pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation method, which is Poisson regression. Based on the results of the gravity model, covering the data of 97 countries with volumes of 95% of world GDP and 85% of international trade flows, the authors identified the potential contribution of possible changes in the foreign trade policy of the EAEU countries to the growth of their foreign trade turnover, including the reorientation of country directions. The authors gave a quantitative assessment of the foreign trade potential of the EAEU countries in trade with the main partners. The study presents an assessment of the impact on the volume of foreign trade of Belarus of its possible accession to the WTO, which could increase this volume by 11.4%. Particular attention is paid to modeling the trade potential of the EAEU countries with 40 leading trading partners. An analysis of the foreign trade of these countries shows no noticeable changes in the structure of its directions, and the foreign trade turnover continues to grow at an insufficient rate. The simulation results led to the conclusion that the EAEU countries have significant trade potential with the United States, the United Arab Emirates, Singapore, Sweden, Malaysia, Spain and Brazil, and the actual volume of trade with these countries is less than 50% of the potential. Realization of this potential requires, as shown in the study, significant changes in the foreign economic orientation of the EAEU countries and modification of foreign trade policy.

1. Piazolo D. Trade integration between Eastern and Western Europe: Policies follow the market. Journal of Economic Integration. 1997;12(3):259–297. DOI: 10.11130/jei.1997.12.3.259

2. Drábek Z. The stability of trade policy in the countries in transition and their integration into the multilateral trading system. The World Economy. 1996;19(6):721–745. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9701.1996.tb00708.x

3. Hamilton C. B., Winters L.A. Opening up international trade with Eastern Europe. Economic Policy. 1992;7(14):77–116. DOI: 10.2307/1344513

4. Drábek Z., Smith A. Trade performance and trade policy in Central and Eastern Europe. CEPR Discussion Papers. 1995;(1182).

5. Tkachenko A.A. Sinuous paths of integration: Russia in the EAEU. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2020;13(6):46–57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999–849X‑2020–13–6–46–57

6. Аrapova E.Y., Isachenko T. M. Russian trade policy: Main trends and impact on bilateral trade flows. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies. 2019;12(1):26–48. DOI: 10.1504/ijepee.2019.098684

7. Gorynia M., Nowak J., Trąpczyński P., Wolniak R. Friend or foe? On the role of institutional reforms in the investment development path of Central and East European economies. International Business Review. 2019;28(3):575–587. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.12.003

8. Levchenko A.A. International trade and institutional change. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 2013;29(5):1145–1181. DOI: 10.1093/jleo/ews008

9. Lanz R., Lee W., Stolzenburg V. Distance, formal and informal institutions in international trade. WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD. 2019(03). URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201903_e.pdf

10. Tkachenko A.A., ed. Russia’s foreign economic policy in the context of global risks. Moscow: KURS; 320 p. (In Russ.).

11. Cieślik E., Biegańska J., Środa-Murawska S. The intensification of foreign trade in post-socialist countries and their role in global value chains. Acta Oeconomica. 2016;66(3):467–489. DOI: 10.1556/032.2016.66.3.5

12. Rose A.K. Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? The American Economic Review. 2004;94(1):98–114. DOI: 10.1257/000282804322970724

13. Bussière M., Fidrmuc J., Schnatz B. Trade integration of Central and Eastern European countries: Lessons from a gravity model. ECB Working Paper Series. 2005;(545). URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp545.pdf

14. Cieślik E., Biegańska J., Środa-Murawska S. Evaluation of trends in foreign trade development in the postcommunist countries of Europe in the years 2000–2012 following their accession to the EU. Quaestiones Geographicae. 2016;35(4):35–48. DOI: 10.1515/quageo‑2016–0033

15. Gurgul H., Lach Ł. Export diversification and economic growth in transition: lessons from the 2008 financial crisis in CEE. Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych = Quantitative Methods in Economics. 2013;14(1):137–149. URL: http://qme.sggw.pl/pdf/MIBE_T14_z1.pdf

16. Jaklič A., Obloj K., Svetličič M., Kronegger L. Evolution of Central and Eastern Europe related international business research. Journal of Business Research. 2020;108:421–434. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.046

17. Kodirzoda F.A. External and internal orientation vector of trade relations of the EAEU countries. Vestnik universiteta (Rossiisko-Tadzhikskii (Slavyanskii) universitet) = The University Bulletin. Russian-Tajik Slavonic University. 2020;(3):73–81.

18. Polivach A.P. Trade of Central Asian countries with Russia and China. Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii = Russia and New States of Eurasia. 2019;(4):136–147. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/2073–4786–2019–4–136–147

19. Fynchina Kh.A. The Eurasian Economic Union and the development of foreign trade of the Kyrgyz Republic. Vestnik Kyrgyzsko-Rossiiskogo Slavyanskogo universiteta = Herald of KRSU. 2020;20(7):55–62. (In Russ.).

20. Kembayev Zh. Partnership between the European Union and the Republic of Kazakhstan: Problems and perspectives. European Foreign Affairs Review. 2016;21(2):185–203.

21. Goldberg P. K., Pavcnik N. The effects of trade policy. In: Bagwell K., Staiger R. W., eds. Handbook of commercial policy. Vol. 1, Pt. A. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 2016:161–206. DOI: 10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.002

22. Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2010;(5430). URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/3913/WPS5430.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

23. Head K., Mayer N., Ries J. The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics. 2010;81(1):1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.01.002

24. Anderson J.E., van Wincoop E. Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. The American Economic Review. 2003;93(1):170–192. DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455214

25. Subramanian A., Wei S.-J. The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. Journal of International Economics. 2007;72(1):151–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.07.007

26. Jochmans K., Verardi V. Instrumental-variable estimation of gravity equations. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics. 2019;(1994). DOI: 10.17863/CAM.47808