Examining the Portfolio Diversification Benefits with Selected Developed, Emerging and Frontier Markets

The financial market integration is important for the investors to have the portfolio diversification of their investment. The investors do the portfolio diversification to the market where they can have higher return with lower risk.

The purpose of the paper is to analyse portfolio diversification opportunities among Asian Developed, Emerging and Frontier markets.

The study is performed using various methods such as Correlation, Granger causality test, Johansen cointegration test, Portfolio diversification analysis using various diversification strategies. The study examines portfolio diversification opportunities by comparing non-diversified portfolio (home market) with diversified portfolios (Equal Weighted Portfolio, Minimum Variance Portfolio and Maximum Sharpe Portfolio). The gain from the portfolio diversification was also analyzed to measure the benefits of the diversification. The study found that the lack of integration among many markets proves the existence of the portfolio diversification opportunity. Study is unique in a nature that it examines the portfolio diversification benefits for the investors in developed, emerging and frontier markets, as past studies were limited to developed markets only.

The study concluded that the investors can gain better return, lower risk and higher Sharpe with portfolio diversification in international market. The researchers can examine in future the portfolio diversification benefits with other frontier and emerging markets for the investors of the developed markets.

1. Click R. W., Plummer M. G. Stock market integration in ASEAN after the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Asian Economics. 2005;16(1):5–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2004.11.018

2. Patel R. J. BRICS emerging markets linkages: Evidence from the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. The Journal of Private Equity. 2019;22(4):42–59. DOI: 10.3905/jpe.2019.1.089

3. Grubel H. G. Internationally diversified portfolios: Welfare gains and capital flows. The American Economic Review. 1968;58(5):1299–1314.

4. Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance. 1952;7(1):77–91. DOI: 10.2307/2975974

5. Kenen P. B. Capital mobility and financial integration: A survey. Princeton Studies in International Finance. 1976;(39). URL: https://ies.princeton.edu/pdf/S39.pdf

6. Vos R. Savings, investment and foreign capital flows: Have capital markets become more integrated? The Journal of Development Studies. 1988;24(3):310–334. DOI: 10.1080/00220388808422072

7. Salem R., Al Shaher T., Khasawneh O. International portfolio diversification benefits for Middle Eastern investors. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking. 2011;(22):22–31. URL: https://www.ammanu.edu.jo/English/pdf/StaffResearch/business/652/International%20Portfolio%20Diversification%20Benefits%20for%20Middle%20Eastern%20Investors.pdf

8. Nguyen T. D., Elisabeta P. Financial integration and diversification benefits: China and ASEAN 4 countries. Managerial Finance. 2016;42(5):496–514. DOI: 10.1108/MF-12–2014–0300

9. Ali M. H., Uddin M. A., Chowdhury M. A.F., Masih M. Cross-country evidence of Islamic portfolio diversification: Are there opportunities in Saudi Arabia? Managerial Finance. 2019;45(1):36–53. DOI: 10.1108/MF-03–2018–0126

10. Lu Q., Vivian A. Domestically formed international diversification. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2020;103:102131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.102131

11. Pätäri E., Ahmed S., John E., Karell V. The changing role of emerging and frontier markets in global portfolio diversification. Cogent Economics & Finance. 2019;7(1):1701910. DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2019.1701910

12. Meric I., Ratner M., Meric G. Co-movements of sector index returns in the world’s major stock markets in bull and bear markets: Portfolio diversification implications. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2008;17(1):156–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2005.12.001

13. Ding D. K., Harris F. H., Lau S. T., McInish T. H. An investigation of price discovery in informationally-linked markets: Equity trading in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 1999;9(3– 4):317–329. DOI: 10.1016/S1042–444X(99)00005–5

14. Jeon B.-N., Von Furstenberg G. M. Growing international co-movement in stock price indexes. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Business. 1990;30(3):15–31.

15. Harvey A. C. The econometric analysis of time series. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1990. 401 p.

16. Dickey D. A., Fuller W. A. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1979;74(366a):427–431. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531

17. Dickey D. A., Bell W. R., Miller R. B. Unit roots in time series models: Tests and implications. The American Statistician. 1986;40(1):12–26. DOI: 10.2307/2683112

18. Phillips P. C.B., Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika. 1988;75(2):335–346. DOI: 10.2307/2336182

19. Granger C. W.J. Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1986;48(3):213–228. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–0084.1986.mp48003002.x

20. MacKinnon J.G., Haug A. A., Michelis L. Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 1999;14(5):563–577. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099–1255(199909/10)14:5%3C563::AID-JAE530%3E3.0.CO;2-R