Modification of the Three-Factor Fama-French Model and its Application to Assess the Efficiency of the Portfolio Management of Russian Investment Funds
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-2-17-27
Abstract
The subject of the paper is the activity of managers of Russian investment funds. The aim of the paper is to determine the possibility of using widely applied abroad methods of assessment of the managers’ diving abilities in the Russian practice, adaptation to the conditions of the Russian market of the three — factor Fama-French model. The methods of analysis and synthesis, quantitative assessment, including in relation to the study of the assessment of the portfolio managers picking abilities, are used as the main research methods. The relevance of the research is to make proposals on the transformation of the Russian approach to assess the performance of collective investment fund managers and its subsequent practical use. The article presents the results of a statistical assessment of the effectiveness of the activities of Russian managers of open-end investment funds shares from the perspective of micro-forecasting. According to the results of the research, conclusions are drawn that both the multifactorial Fama-French regression and CAPM, traditionally used in foreign practice, tested on the data of the Russian stock market, have sufficient predictive abilities and allow to obtain statistically significant estimations of variables and finally can be recommended for practical use in Russia. The novelty of the research consists in the development of the author’s modification of the three-factor Fama-French regression (a model with the SPX-factor), which allows to obtain better regression factors estimations in comparison with the basic model, more accurately explains the process of excess returns generation of Russian openend investment funds and can be recommended for practical use. The result of the statistical analysis is the conclusion that the processes of portfolio management of Russian investment funds in 2009–2019 were characterized by a lack of managers’ skill for successful picking, the profitability received by the funds was more ensured by random factors.
Keywords
JEL: C23, E44, G02, G11, G23
About the Authors
E. R. BezsmertnayaRussian Federation
Ekaterina R. Bezsmertnaya - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Dean of the Faculty of Economics and Business
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
E. A. Kolganova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Kolganova - Postgraduate student, Department of Financial Markets and Financial Engineering
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
References
1. Abramov A. E., Radygin M. I., Chernova M. I. Efficiency in portfolio management of equity funds and its evaluation. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy. 2019;14(4):8–47. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18288/1994–5124–2019–4–8–47
2. Ferson W. E., Schadt R. W. Measuring fund strategy and performance in changing economic conditions. The Journal of Finance. 1996;51(2):425–461. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–6261.1996.tb02690.x
3. Murav’ev D. M. Are Russian mutual funds outperforming the market? Moscow: Russian School of Economics; 2006. 29 p. (Preprint # BSP / 2006/085 R). URL: https://www.nes.ru/files/old-nes/programs/econ/preprints/2006/Muravyev_rus.pdf (In Russ.).
4. Nazarova V. V., Khrabrova V. E. Analysis of activity of share fund by means of complex indicator of fund efficiency. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2014;(11):44–52. (In Russ.).
5. Olkova A. E. Mutual funds performance assessment techniques: Comparative analysis. Finansovyj zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2017;(3):85–95. (In Russ).
6. Lukin M. V., Protas N. G. Evaluating the effectiveness of unit managers and investment funds. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 2020;10(11–1):169–175. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34670/AR.2020.21.64.017
7. Harvey C. R., Liu Y. Luck versus skill in the cross section of mutual fund returns: Reexamining the evidence. The Journal of Finance. 2022;77(3):1921–1966. DOI: 10.1111/jofi.13123
8. Livingston M., Yao P., Zhou L. The volatility of mutual fund performance. Journal of Economics and Business. 2019;(104):105835. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2019.02.001
9. Berzon N. I., Doroshin D. I. Features of the application of financial investment efficiency indicators. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2012;(14):21–33. (In Russ.).
10. Fama E. F. Components of investment performance. The Journal of Finance. 1972;27(3):551–567. DOI: 10.2307/2978261
11. Treynor J. L., Black F. How to use security analysis to improve portfolio selection. The Journal of Business. 1973;46(1):66–86. DOI: 10.1086/295508
12. Kon S. J., Jen F. C. Estimation of time-varying systematic risk and performance for mutual fund portfolios: An application of switching regression. The Journal of Finance. 1978;33(2):457–475. DOI: 10.2307/2326563
13. Jensen M. C. Risk, the pricing of capital assets, and the evaluation of investment portfolios. The Journal of Business. 1969;42(2):167–247. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–6261.1969.tb01710.x
14. Fama E. F., French K. R. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics. 1993;33(1):3–56. DOI: 10.1016/0304–405X(93)90023–5
15. Davis J. L., Fama E. F., French K. R. Characteristics, covariances, and average returns: 1929 to 1997. The Journal of Finance. 2000;55(1):389–406. DOI: 10.1111/0022–1082.00209
16. Do V., Faff R., Wickramanayake J. An empirical analysis of hedge fund performance: The case of Australian hedge funds industry. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 2005;15(4–5):377–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2005.04.006
17. Bu Q. Behind the scenes of mutual fund alpha. Journal of Accounting and Finance. 2016;16(1):90–103. URL: http://www.na-businesspress.com/JAF/BuQ_Web16_1_.pdf
18. Carhart M. M. On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance. 1997;52(1):57–82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–6261.1997.tb03808.x
19. Atilgan Y., Demirtas K. O., Gunaydin D. Predicting equity returns in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2021;57(13):3721–3738. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2020.1822808
20. Rouwenhorst K. G. International momentum strategies. The Journal of Finance. 1998;53(1):267–284. DOI: 10.1111/0022–1082.95722
21. Galanova A. V., Dukova V. V. Determinants of mutual funds performance. Korporativnye finansy = Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2018;12(4):43–60. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073–0438.12.4.2018.43–60
22. Mikova E., Teplova T., Munir Q. Puzzling premiums on FX markets: Carry trade, momentum, and value alone and strategy diversification. Emerging Markets, Finance & Trade. 2020;56(1):126–148. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1562897
23. Fama E. F., French K. R. A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics. 2015;116(1):1–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
24. Cremers K. J.M., Fulkerson J. A., Riley T. B. Active share and the predictability of the performance of separate accounts. Financial Analysts Journal. 2022;78(1):39–57. DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2021.1984826
25. Harvey C. R., Liu Y. False (and missed) discoveries in financial economics. The Journal of Finance. 2020;75(5):2503–2553. DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12951
26. Parshakov P. A. Assessment of the effectiveness of asset management of Russian mutual investment funds. Cand. econ. sci. diss. Moscow: NRU HSE; 2014. 184 p. URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/xf/2014/03/27/1318664430/das%20parchakov%2026%20marta.pdf (In Russ.).
27. Jin D., Kacperczyk M., Kahraman B., Suntheim F. Swing pricing and fragility in open-end mutual funds. The Review of Financial Studies. 2022;35(1):1–50. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhab022
Review
For citations:
Bezsmertnaya E.R., Kolganova E.A. Modification of the Three-Factor Fama-French Model and its Application to Assess the Efficiency of the Portfolio Management of Russian Investment Funds. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2023;27(2):17-27. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-2-17-27