Использование модели Альтмана Z” при прогнозировании финансового положения компаний, зарегистрированных на турецкой фондовой бирже

Для измерения финансовых показателей компаний и выявления их финансового кризиса в научной литературе существует множество моделей. Среди них модель Z” Score является одной из наиболее используемых, поскольку она основана на бухгалтерском учете и проста в применении. Цель данного исследования — выяснить, применима ли модель Z” Score, усовершенствованная Альтманом, для оценки стоимости фирмы в долгосрочной перспективе. Проведен панельный анализ коинтеграции между переменными, где в качестве независимой переменной выступала стоимость компании, акции которой котируются на турецкой фондовой бирже BIST (istanbul stock exchange), а в качестве зависимой переменной — Z” Score. Несмотря на то, что исследование проводилось конкретно в Турции, его результаты считаются применимыми во всем мире, так как Альтман утверждает, что модель Z” Score может также использоваться компаниями из развивающихся стран. Доказано, что модель Altman Z” Score, примененная в отношении публичной компании, имеет высокую способность прогнозировать финансовый успех фирм. Согласно результатам анализа увеличение на 1 единицу значения Z” баллов компаний приводит к увеличению на 0,353 единицы логарифмического дохода, рассчитанного по стоимости фирмы. Модель Z Score может быть полезна для руководителей компаний, бухгалтерских и финансовых менеджеров, аудиторов, кредиторов, инвесторов при принятии верных решений, связанных с предварительной оценкой финансовых показателей компаний.

1. Ahn B. S., Cho S. S., Kim C. Y. The integrated methodology of rough set theory and artificial neural network for business failure prediction. Expert Systems with Applications. 2000;18(2):65–74. DOI: 10.1016/S 0957–4174(99)00053–6

2. Moyer R. C. Forecasting financial failure: A re-examination. Financial Management. 1977;6(1):11–17. DOI: 10.2307/3665489

3. Petty J. W., Keown J. A., Scott D. F., Martin J. D. Basic financial management. 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1993. 684 p.

4. Brigham E. F., Gapenski L. C. Financial management theory and practice. 8th ed. Chicago, IL: The Dryden Press; 1997. 875 p.

5. Hunter J, Isachenkova N. Failure risk: A comparative study of UK and Russian firms. Journal of Policy Modeling. 2001;23(5):511–521. DOI: 10.1016/S 0161–8938(01)00064–3

6. Poston K. M., Harmon K., Gramlich J. D. A test of financial ratios as predictors of turnaround versus failure among financially distressed firms. Journal of Applied Business Research. 1994;10(1):41–56. DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v10i1.5962

7. McKee T. E. Rough sets bankruptcy prediction models versus auditor signalling rates. Journal of Forecasting. 2003;22(8):569–586. DOI: 10.1002/for.875

8. Meeks G., Meeks J. G. Self-fulfilling prophecies of failure: The endogenous balance sheets of distressed companies. Abacus. 2009;45(1):22–43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–6281.2009.00276.x

9. Chiarello T. C., Pletsch C. S., Da Silva A., Da Silva T. P. Financial performance, intangible assets and value creation in brazilian and chilean information technology companies. Revista Galega de Economia = Economic Review of Galicia. 2014;23(4):73–88. DOI: 10.15304/rge.23.4.2787

10. Lifschutz S., Jacobi A. Predicting bankruptcy: Evidence from Israel. International Journal of Business and Management. 2010;5(4):133–141. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v5n4p133

11. Andrade G., Kaplan S. N. How costly is financial (not economic) distress? Evidence from highly leveraged transactions that became distressed. The Journal of Finance. 1998;53(5):1443–1493. DOI: 10.1111/0022–1082.00062

12. Outecheva N. Corporate financial distress: An empirical analysis of distress risk. Doctor oeconomiae dissertation. St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen; 2007. 200 p. URL: https://www.e-helvetica.nb.admin.ch/api/download/urn%3Anbn%3Ach%3Abel‑130003%3Adis3430.pdf/dis3430.pdf

13. Schall L. D., Haley C. W. Introduction to financial management. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1983. 912 p.

14. Moyer R. C., McGuigan J.R., Kretlow W. J. Contemporary financial management. 4th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company; 1992. 862 p.

15. Altman E. I. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance. 1968;23(4):589–609. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–6261.1968.tb00843.x

16. Altman E. I. Corporate financial distress: A complete guide to predicting, avoiding, and dealing with bankruptcy. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc;. 1983. 368 p. (Frontiers in Finance Series).

17. Altman E. I. Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1993. 384 p.

18. Zmijewski M. E. Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research. 1984;22:59–82. DOI: 10.2307/2490859

19. Springate G. L. Predicting the possibility of failure in a Canadian firm. Unpublished doctoral dissrtation. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University; 1978.

20. Ohlson J. A. Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research. 1980;18(1):109–131. DOI: 10.2307/2490395

21. Fulmer J. G., Moon J. E., Gavin T. A., Erwin M. J. A bankruptcy classification model for small firms. Journal of Commercial Bank Lending. 1984;66(11):25–37.

22. Calandro J. Considering the utility of Altman’s Z"-score as a strategic assessment and performance management tool. Strategy & Leadership. 2007;35(5):37–43. DOI: 10.1108/ 10878570710819206

23. Hayes S. K., Hodge K. A., Hughes L. W. A study on the efficiency of Altman’s Z to predict of specialty retail firms doing business in contemporary times. Economics and Business Journal: Inquiries & Perspectives. 2010;3(1):122–134.

24. Beaver W. H. Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research. 1966;4:71–111. DOI: 10.2307/2490171

25. Grice J. S., Ingram R. W. Tests of the generalizability of Altman’s bankruptcy prediction model. Journal of Business Research. 2001;54(1):53–61. DOI: 10.1016/S 0148–2963(00)00126–0

26. Platt H. D., Platt M. B. Understanding differences between financial distress and bankruptcy. Review of Applied Economics. 2006;2(2):141–157.

27. Bemmann M. Improving the comparability of insolvency predictions. Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics. 2005;(8). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.731644

28. Dichev I. D. Is the risk of bankruptcy a systematic risk? The Journal of Finance. 1998;53(3):1131–1147. DOI: 10.1111/0022–1082.00046

29. Francis J. Corporate compliance with debt covenants. Journal of Accounting Research. 1990;28(2):326–347. DOI: 10.2307/2491153

30. Miller W. Comparing models of corporate bankruptcy prediction: Distance to default vs. Z-score. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2009. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1461704

31. Takahashi M., Taques F., Basso L. Altman’s bankruptcy prediction model: Test on a wide out of business private companies sample. iBusiness. 2018;10(1):21–39. DOI: 10.4236/ib.2018.101002

32. Charalambous C., Charuitou A., Kaourou F. Comparative analysis of artificial neural network models: Application in bankruptcy prediction. Annals of Operations Research. 2000;99(1):403–425. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019292321322

33. Hanson R. O. A study of Altman’s revised four-variable Z"-score bankruptcy prediction model as it applies to the service industry. Doctor of business administration dissertation. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova Southeastern University; 2003. 153 p. URL: https://www.proquest.com/openview/d787fc069fb7c0c4b93122e3faba6174/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

34. Tamari M. Financial ratios as a means of forecasting bankruptcy. Management International Review. 1966;6(4):15–21.

35. Ramaratnam M. S., Jayaraman R. A study on measuring the financial soundness of select firms with special reference to Indian steel industry — An empirical view with Z score. Asian Journal of Management Research. 2010;1(1):724–735.

36. Ijaz M. S., Hunjra A. I., Hameed Z., Maqbool A., Azam R. Assessing the financial failure using Z-score and current ratio: A case of sugar sector listed companies of Karachi stock exchange. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013;23(6):863–870. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.23.06. 2243

37. Tyagi V. A study to measures the financial health of selected firms with special reference to Indian logistic industry: An application of Altman’s Z score. Industrial Engineering Letters. 2014;4(4):43–52. URL: https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/IEL/article/view/12246/12599

38. Sansesh C. The analytical study of Altman Z score on NIFTY 50 companies. International Journal of Management & Social Sciences. 2016;3(3):433–438. DOI: 10.21013/jmss.v3.n3.p6

39. Shariq M. Bankruptcy prediction by using the Altman Z-score model in Oman: A case study of Raysut Cement Company SAOG and its subsidiaries. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal. 2016;10(4):70–80. DOI: 10.14453/aabfj.v10i4.6

40. Ko Y.-C., Fujita H., Li T. An evidential analysis of Alman’s Z-score for financial prediction: Case study on solar energy companies. Applied Soft Computing. 2017;52:748–759. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.09.050

41. Milašinović M., Knežević S., Mitrović A. Bankruptcy forecasting of hotel companies in the Republic of Serbia using Altman’s Z-score model. Hotel and Tourism Management. 2019;7(2):87–95. DOI: 10.5937/menhottur1902087M

42. Muzır E., Çağlar N. The accuracy of financial distress prediction models in Turkey: A comparative investigation with simple model proposals. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi = Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences. 2009;9(2):15–48. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6827016.pdf

43. Yılmaz H., Yıldıran M. Borsada işlem gören işletmelerde mali başarısızlık tahmini: Altman modeli’nin BIST uygulaması. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi = Journal of Aksaray University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 2015;7(3):43–49.

44. Özdemir F. S. Turkish uniform accounting system and applicability of Altman Z score models in the context of public and private companies. Ege Akademik Bakış = Ege Academic Review. 2014;14(1):147–161. (In Turk.).

45. Altman E. I. Predicting financial distress of companies: Revisiting the Z-score and ZETA models. 2000. URL: https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~ealtman/Zscores.pdf

46. Yıldız A. Corporate ratings based on the corporate governance index and Altman z score applying with the logistic regression method. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi = Suleyman Demirel University. The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 2014;19(3):71–89. (In Turk.).

47. Breusch T. S., Pagan A. R. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification tests in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies. 1980;47(1):239–253. DOI: 10.2307/2297111

48. Pesaran M. H. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Empirical Economics. 2021;60(1):13–50. DOI: 10.1007/s00181–020–01875–7

49. Altıntaş H., Mercan M. The relationship between research and development (R&D) expenditures: Panel cointegration analysis under cross sectional dependency on OECD countries. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi = Ankara University SBF Journal. 2015;70(2):345–376. (In Turk.).

50. Pesaran M. H., Ullah A., Yamagata T. A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. The Econometrics Journal. 2008;11(1):105–127. DOI: 10.1111/j.1368–423X.2007.00227.x

51. Tatoğlu Yerdelen F. Panel Zaman Serileri Analizi Stata Uygulamalı. 3rd ed. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık; 2017. 359 p.

52. Kar M., Ağır H., Türkmen S. Econometric estimation of the relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in developing countries. In: Yardımcıoğlu F., Beşel F., Inan V., eds. Economic studies. Pesa Publications. 2018;2:305–321. (In Turk.).

53. Hsiao C. Analysis of panel data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2015. 562 p. (Econometric Society Monographs. No. 54).

54. Turgut E., Uçan O. Investigation of the relationship between corruption and tax rate in the sample of OECD countries. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi = Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University. The Journal of Graduate School of Social Scienc es. 2019;1(3):1–17. (In Turk.).

55. Taylor M. P., Sarno L. The behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods period. Journal of International Economics. 1998;46(2):281–312. DOI: 10.1016/S 0022–1996(97)00054–8

56. Breuer J. B., McNown R., Wallace M. Series-specific unit root tests with panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2002;64(5):527–546. DOI: 10.1111/1468–0084.00276

57. Pesaran M. H. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2007;22(2):265–312. DOI: 10.1002/jae.951

58. Küçükaksoy İ., Akalın G. Testing of the Fisher hypothesis with a dynamic panel data analysis: An application on OECD countries. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi = Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 2017;35(1):19–40. (In Turk.). DOI: 10.17065/huniibf.303303

59. Çetin M., Doğan İ., Işık H. The impact of energy consumption on environmental pollution: A panel data analysis. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal. 2014;2(1):15–29. (In Turk.).

60. Kao C., Chiang M.-H. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In: Baltagi B. H., Fomby T. B., Carter Hill R., eds. Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2001:179–222. (Advances in Econometrics. Vol. 15). DOI: 10.1016/S 0731–9053(00)15007–8