Financial and Legal Instruments for Ensuring the Technological Sovereignty of Priority Sectors of the Economy of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-2-63-77
Abstract
The urgency of ensuring technological sovereignty is determined by the transformation of the global geopolitical and economic order, where technological superiority has become an integral factor in the stability, well-being and development of all sectors of the economy of the Russian Federation. The purpose of the study is to identify and systematize financial and legal instruments that contribute to ensuring the technological sovereignty of the priority sectors of the Russian economy in the context of sanctions pressure and global technological competition. To achieve the goal, the following tasks are set: to reveal the essence of the concept of “technological sovereignty” as a legal category, to identify and analyze obstacles to ensuring technological sovereignty. The research is based on a comprehensive methodological approach that combines general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, theoretical modeling, a systematic method, formal law, comparative law and the method of legal forecasting. This paper identifies shortcomings and suggests ways to improve existing financial and legal instruments. It is concluded that financial and legal instruments are the basis for building a system of technical sovereignty in Russia. The proposed changes in the legislative framework of the Russian Federation are aimed at improving the legal mechanisms ensuring technological sovereignty. The comprehensive use of financial and legal instruments such as subsidies, tax incentives, public-private partnerships and support through development institutions creates the conditions for technological independence of the country. Optimization of their application requires further systematization of legal regulation and strategic planning, which will effectively respond to the challenges of global competition. The legal work on the implementation of the proposed changes should be comprehensive and systematic.
Keywords
JEL: G18
About the Authors
D. V. GalushkoRussian Federation
Dmitry V. Galushko — Dr. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Chief Researcher at the Center for Research and Expertise, Prof. at the Department of Legal Regulation of Economic Activity, Faculty of Law
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
A. S. Kiselev
Russian Federation
Alexander S. Kiselev — Cand. Sci. (Law), Leading Researcher at the Center for Research and Expertise, Assoc. Prof. at the Department of International and Public Law, Faculty of Law
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
A. V. Ostroushko
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Ostroushko — Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Leading Researcher at the Center for Research and Expertise, Assoc. Prof. at the Department of International and Public Law
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
1. Prokof’ev S.E. Artificial intelligence is the future, but not our everything. Byudzhet. 2024;(3):48-51. (In Russ.).
2. Bassens D., Hendrikse R. Asserting Europe’s technological sovereignty amid American platform finance: Countering financial sector dependence on Big Tech? Political Geography. 2022;97:102648. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102648
3. Csernatoni R. The EU’s hegemonic imaginaries: From European strategic autonomy in defence to technological sovereignty. European Security. 2022;31(3):395-414. DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2022.2103370
4. Prokof’ev S.E., Kameneva E.A., Solyannikova S.P., et al. Ecosystem of universities: Transformation of the Russian education system. Moscow: Infra-M; 2023. 341 p. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/1901313
5. Vainshtok A.L. Aspects of technological sovereignty of fuel and energy companies. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovation & Investment. 2023;(5):444-447.
6. Yasinskii V.A., Kozhevnikov M. Yu. The struggle for technological sovereignty: China’s experience and lessons for Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2023;34(5):704-712. DOI: 10.1134/s1075700723050167 (In Russ.: Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2023;(5):196-209. DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-200-196-209).
7. March Ch., Schieferdecker I. Technological sovereignty as ability, not autarky. International Studies Review. 2023;25(2). DOI: 10.1093/isr/viad012
8. Petrov M.N., Filippov Ya.S. Technological sovereignty: Basic principles of the concept of national scientific and technological security. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki = Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2023;13(3):1185-1198. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/vinec.13.3.118646
9. Kolesnikova T.V. State subsidization of priority industries in the system of instruments of protectionism. In: National financial systems in new geopolitical conditions: Challenges and opportunities for Russia. Proc. Int. sci.-pract. conf. (Rostov-on-Don, June 14, 2024). Rostov-on-Don: Rostov State University of Economics; 2024:23-27. (In Russ.).
10. Fedotova M.A., Pogodina T.V., Karpova S. B. Assessment of trends and prospects for the development of the Russian economy in the context of sanctions pressure. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(1):6-19. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-1-6-19
11. Spiridonov A. A., Fadeeva M. L., Tolstykh T. O. Strategic priorities of support of import substitution in industry. Ekonomika promyshlennosti = Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2023;16(2):166-175. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2023-2-166-175
12. Zhang M. Government guarantee liability and its legal realization in public-private partnerships. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS. 2024;19(2):190-212. DOI: 10.35427/2073-4522-2024-19-2-zhang_min
13. Trotsenko O.S. Models of the implementation of public-private partnership in Russia and foreign countries. Obrazovanie i pravo = Education and Law. 2018;(6):261-266. (In Russ.).
14. Zimin V. A. Activities of public authorities of the region to attract private investment in housing and communal services. Russian Economic Bulletin. 2022;5(1):306-313. (In Russ.).
15. Yevstafyeva Yu.V. Special investment contracts of new edition — SPIC 2.0: Features of use and perspectives. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik = Public Administration. E-Journal. 2023;(99):49-61. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-99-49-61
16. Shepenko R.A., Isaev A.G. Taxation of special investment contracts participants. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review. 2023;7(3):85-94. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(3).85-94
17. Vakhrameev R.A. Reserve fund of a subject of the Russian Federation: Status and ways of modernization. Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya: Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment = Scientific Journal NRU ITMO. Series: Economics and Environmental Management. 2024;(1):93-105. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17586/2310-1172-2024-17-1-93-105
18. Timushev E. N., Yagovkina V. A. Reserve funds in Russian regions: Factors of formation and efficiency assessment. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2023;15(5):61-78. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2023-5-61-78
19. Darajati R. A.P., Santoso B., Widhiyanti H. N. The legal aspects of venture capital as an alternative financing. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. 2023;133(1):41-46. DOI: 10.18551/rjoas.2023-01.05
Review
For citations:
Galushko D.V., Kiselev A.S., Ostroushko A.V. Financial and Legal Instruments for Ensuring the Technological Sovereignty of Priority Sectors of the Economy of the Russian Federation. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2026;30(2):63-77. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-2-63-77
JATS XML


































