Models of Structure Capital Management Based on the Lag Determinants, Including the Cost of Debt and Tax
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-3-195-213
Abstract
The question of the optimal capital structure existence has been a controversial field for scientists for more than 70 years. The development of capital structure theories has prompted scientists to analyze the factors that influence the decision-making on the equity/debt ratio. The applied methods of capital structure management depend on the goals of the company’s management and may include ensuring financial stability, profit maximization or ensuring the return on invested capital. At the same time, managerial decision-making regarding the capital structure is based, as a rule, on informal assessments due to the lack of specific tools that allow for making scientifically sound decisions in this area. The purpose of the study is to develop a formalized approach to capital structure management by varying lag determinants. A three-factor lag model allows us to determine the corporate capital structure based on the increment of three determinants — return on sales, resource efficiency, and equity multiplier. A five-factor lag model takes into account, in addition to the above, the costs of debt and taxes. The choice of a model for capital structure is based on the availability and objectivity of information for calculation. At the same time, both three-factor and five-factor lag models produce a very similar capital structure for the metallurgical industry. As calculations have shown, the difference in modeling arises due to an increase in the return on sales (ΔROS) and an interest burden (ΔIb). Moreover, if the increase in the return on sales exceeds ΔIb, then the share of equity capital will rise. In order to improve the quality of management decisions regarding the capital structure, it is advisable to carry out forecasting using two models, and in practical activity the obtained results should be used as a guideline for possible changes in the total capital structure. The empirical basis of the study was the reporting and forecast data from the largest companies of the metallurgical industry in the Russian Federation over 2019–2023.
About the Authors
E. G. DemidovaRussian Federation
Elena G. Demidova — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Economics, Management, and Production Organization
Stary Oskol, Belgorod Region
E. M. Bogatov
Russian Federation
Egor M. Bogatov — Cand. Sci. (Phys. and Math.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Higher Mathematics and Computer Science, A. A. Ugarov Stary Oskol Technological Institute (branch) of MISIS University; Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Mining, MISIS University Branch
Stary Oskol, Belgorod Region
Gubkin, Belgorod Region
References
1. Khan A., Qureshi M. A., Davidsen P. I. A system dynamics model of capital structure policy for firm value maximization. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 2021;38(4):503-516. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2693
2. Natsir K., Yusbardini Y. The effect of capital structure and firm size on firm value through profitability as intervening variable. In: 8th Int. conf. entrepreneurship and business management (ICEBM 2019) UNTAR. Dordrecht: Atlantis Press; 2020:218-224. DOI: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200626.040
3. Nguyen S. L., Pham C. D., Truong T. V., et al. Relationship between capital structure and firm profitability: Evidence from Vietnamese listed companies. International Journal of Financial Studies. 2023;11(1):45. DOI: 10.3390/ijfs11010045
4. Medzihorský J., Musa H., Krištofík P., Lysenko Y. MM model with taxes and its verification: Suitable methodology to avoid “automatic” negative relations between leverage and profitability. In: Tsounis N., Vlachvei A., eds. Advances in empirical economic research (ICOAE 2022). Cham: Springer; 2023:849-856. (Springer proceedings in business and economics). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-22749-3_52
5. Dang N. H., Vu V. T.T., Ngo X. T., Hoang H. T. V. Study the impact of growth, firm size, capital structure, and profitability on enterprise value: Evidence of enterprises in Vietnam. The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance. 2019;30(1):144-160. DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.22371
6. Kokoreva M., Stepanova A., Povkh K. The new strategy of high-tech companies — hidden sources of growth. Foresight and STI Governance. 2023;17(1):18-32. DOI:10.17323/2500-2597.2023.1.18.32 (In Russ.: Forsait. 2023;17(1):18-32. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2023.1.18.32).
7. Bui T. N., Nguyen X. H., Pham K. T. The effect of capital structure on firm value: A study of companies listed on the Vietnamese stock market. International Journal of Financial Studies. 2023;11(3):100. DOI: 10.3390/ijfs11030100
8. Hrynyuk N., Dokiienko L., Levchenko V., Trynchuk V. Capital structure as a criterion of efficient management of the corporation’s financial recourses. Finansovo-kreditna diyal’nist’: problemi teorii ta praktiki = Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice. 2023;2(49):326-337. DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.2.49.2023.4006
9. Brusov P. N., Filatova T. V., Kulik V. L. Incorporating CAPM into capital structure theories: Accounting for business and financial risks. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(5):83-108. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-5-83-108
10. Ramli N. A., Latan H., Solovida G. T. Determinants of capital structure and firm financial performance — a PLS-SEM approach: Evidence from Malaysia and Indonesia. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2019;71:148-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2018.07.001
11. Nenu E. A., Vintilă G., Gherghina Ş. C. The impact of capital structure on risk and firm performance: Empirical evidence for the Bucharest Stock Exchange listed companies. International Journal of Financial Studies. 2018;6(2):41. DOI: 10.3390/ijfs6020041
12. Kurznack L., Schoenmaker D., Schramade W. A model of long-term value creation. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2021.1920231
13. Brusov P. N., Filatova T. V., Kulik V. L. Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) 2.0: Account of business and financial risk. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(2):128-142. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-2-128-142
14. DeAngelo H. The capital structure puzzle: What are we missing? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2022;57(2):413-454. DOI: 10.1017/S002210902100079X
15. Brusov P., Filatova T. Capital structure theory: Past, present, future. Mathematics. 2023;11(3):616. DOI: 10.3390/math11030616
16. Chernenko V. A., Burov A. N. Russian and global capital structure approach: Enterprise value impact. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2019;(1):38-42. (In Russ.).
17. Zhukov A. A., Nikulin E. D., Shchuchkin D. A. Bankruptcy risk factors of Russian companies. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(6):131-155. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-6-131-155
18. Schoenmaker D., Schramade W. Capital structure. In: Schoenmaker D., Schramade W. Corporate finance for long-term value. Cham: Springer; 2023:431-462. (Springer texts in business and economics). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-35009-2_15
19. Kulwizira Lukanima B. An overview of capital structure and cost of capital. In: Corporate valuation. Classroom companion: Business. Cham: Springer; 2023:323-337. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-28267-6_11
20. Kruk S. Impact of capital structure on corporate value — review of literature. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2021;14(4):155. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm14040155
21. Nikitushkina I. V., Makarova S. G., eds. Capital structure of the corporation: Theory and practice. Moscow: Economic Department of Moscow State University; 2013.112 p. (In Russ.).
22. Dao B. T.T., Ta T. D.N. A meta-analysis: Capital structure and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Development. 2020;22(1):111-129. DOI: 10.1108/JED-12-2019-0072
23. Aftab M., Shehzadi S., Qureshi F. Does economic policy uncertainty matter for a firm’s leverage and speed of adjustment? Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. 2024;16(5):1241-1258. DOI: 10.1108/ APJBA-10-2022-0452
24. Bogatov E. M., Demidova E. G. On the application of the formula of increments in the theory of capital structure. In: Proc. Int. conf. CROMSH‑2022: 33rd Crimean Autumn Mathematical School-symposium on spectral and evolutionary problems (Alushta, September 16–25, 2022). Simferopol: ARIAL; 2022:62. (In Russ.).
25. Demidova E. G., Bogatov E. M. Optimization of corporate capital structure. In: Modern problems of mining and metallurgical complex. Science and production. 19th All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. Stary Oskol: MISIS University of Science and Technology; 2022:52-56. (In Russ.).
26. Demidova E. G., Bogatov E. M. Modeling of the corporate capital structure. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2023;(6):62-75. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-6-62-75 (In Russ.).
27. Demidova E. G., Bogatov E. M. Modeling of corporate capital structure based on the five-factor DuPont model. In: 5th Russ. econ. congr. “REC‑2023”. Kleiner G. B., Lyubimov I. L., Simachev Yu.V., comp. Vol. 14. Thematic conf. “Economics of the firm, sectoral markets and industrial policy”. Moscow: New Economic Association; 2023:26-30. URL: http://www.econorus.org/pdf/Volume14_REC‑2023.pdf (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Demidova E.G., Bogatov E.M. Models of Structure Capital Management Based on the Lag Determinants, Including the Cost of Debt and Tax. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2026;30(3):195-213. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-3-195-213
JATS XML


































