THE POLICY OF FINANCIAL CONSOLIDATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE FACE OF EXTERNAL SHOCKS

Topic. The article discusses the policy of progressive fiscal consolidation carried out in developed countries and in Russia. There is also a characteristic of fiscal policy in Russia.

 Purpose. We aim to identify the actual effects of the policy of financial consolidation in terms of a tight dependence on the cyclical development of the world economy.

Methodology. We used the methodology of macroeconomic analysis, systemic approach, statistical methods (cluster analysis), and methods of mathematical statistics and econometrics.

Results. The rising debt of the developed countries in conditions of chronic budget deficit actualized the task of fiscal consolidation. Initially, the idea of fiscal consolidation was to implement a progressive consolidation, i. e. the reduction of budget expenditures, which would contribute to the formation of the financial potential. In turn, the financial potential is realized in the form of a budget surplus that could be used to reduce the tax burden and rise of spending in the future. Literature indicates on the effect of reproduction of the austerity measures due to changes in budget institutions; it limits the ability to stimulate the economy through measures of fiscal policy. Thus, the approach to the implementation of fiscal policy is offset, in the direction of tightening. The analysis of fiscal policy in Russia since the late 1990s does not allow concluding that its character corresponds to the ideas of progressive fiscal consolidation. Despite the creation of a significant budget surplus in times of boom, it practically was not used for the task of stimulating economic development.

Conclusions. The policy of fiscal consolidation, ongoing in Russia, primarily aimed at solving a narrow range of budget issues and is not intended for the future to stimulate the economy.

1. Schoefer A., Streeck W. Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press Ltd., 2013.

2. Cordes J. J. How Yesterday’s Decisions Affect Today’s Budget and Fiscal Options. In: Steuerle E. C. / Kawai M. (eds.). The New World Fiscal Order. Washington: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 95–116.

3. Cottarelli С. Revenue Mobilization in Developing Countries. Washington: IMF, 2011.

4. Kraay A., Serven L. Fiscal Policy as a Tool for Stabilization in Developing Countries: Background Note for 2014. World Development Report Managing Risk for Development. Washington, 2013.

5. Riaz N., Munir K. Fiscal Policy and Macroeconomic Stability in South Asian Countries. MPRA Paper no. 74247, 6 October 2016. URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74247/1/MPRA_paper_74247pdа (accessed 20.10.2017).

6. Schäfer H-B. The Sovereign Debt Crisis in Europe, Save Banks Not States. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2012, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 179–195.

7. Candelon B., Palm F. P. Banking and Debt Crises in Europe: The Dangerous Liaisons? De Economist, 2010, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 81–99.

8. Claessens S., Laeven L., Igan D. O., Dell’Ariccia G. Lessons and Policy Implications from the Global Financial Crisis [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=23637.

9. Perry G., Suescún R., Servén L. Fiscal Policy, Stabilization, and Growth: Prudence or Abstinence? IDB Publications, 2008.

10. Breunig C., Busemeyer M. R. Fiscal Austerity and the Trade-off between Public Investment and Social Spending. Journal of European Public Policy. 2012, no. 19 (6), pp. 921–938.

11. Haffert L., Mehrtens Ph. From Austerity to Expansion? Consolidation, Budget Surpluses, and the Decline of Fiscal Capacity. MPIfG Discussion Paper 13/16, Köln, December 2013.

12. Batini N., Eyraud L., and Weber A. A Simple Method to Compute Fiscal Multipliers. IMF Working Paper WP/14/93, June 2014. 13. Мандель И. Д. Кластерный анализ. М.: Финансы и статистика, 1988. 176 с. Mandel’ I. D. Cluster analysis. Moscow: Finance and Statistics, 1988. 176 p. (In Russ.).

13. Наследов А. SPSS 19: Профессиональный статистический анализ данных. СПб.: Питер, 2011. Nasledov A. SPSS 19: Professional statistical analysis of data. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2011. (In Russ.).

14. Букина И. С., Лыкова Л. Н. Формирование бюджетно-налоговой политики России в условиях внешних шоков // Вестник Института экономики РАН. 2016. № 6. С. 52–65. Bukina I. S., Lykova L. N. Formation of the budgetary-tax policy Russia in the conditions of external shocks. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN = Bulletin of Institute of Economics RAS, 2016, no. 6, pp. 52–65. (In Russ.).

15. Букина И. С. Парадоксы финансовой политики в России // Федерализм. 2014. № 2. С. 25–34. Bukina I. S. The paradoxes of financial policy in Russia. Federalizm = Federalism, 2014, no. 2, pp. 25–34. (In Russ.).

16. Маневич В. Е. Макроэкономическая ситуация в российской экономике в 2015–2016 гг. и перспективы экономического роста // Экономическая наука современной России. 2017. № 3 (78). С. 39–54. Manevich V. E. The macroeconomic situation in the Russian economy in 2015–2016 and the prospects for economic growth. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = The economic science of modern Russia, 2017, no. 3 (78), pp. 39–54. (In Russ.).

17. Erbil N. Is Fiscal Policy Procyclical in Developing Oil-Producing Countries? IMF Working Paper WP/11/171. Washington: IMF. July 2011.

18. Strawczynski M., Zeira J. Procyclicality of Fiscal Policy in Emerging Countries: The Cycle is the Trend. Fiscal Policy and Macroeconomic Performance, Vol. 17. Central Bank of Chile, 2013. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2124456 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2124456 (accessed 26.10.2017)