Digital Property and New Economic Relations

Modern economic relations are developing under the influence of digital property that creates conditions for unprecedented socialization of production and new realities in the relations of appropriation and alienation. This requires both theoretical interpretation and practical research. The aim of the article is to identify current trends in the development of digital property and the new economic relations that it forms in the world, to systematize the conditions for digital property in Russia. The authors used the findings of institutional and evolutionary economic theories, political economy, as well as the principles and methods of SWOT-analysis in order to systematize the issue. The paradigm of the development of Russia should be changed from consumption to production of innovative products and technologies of the digital economy. The paper presents the essential characteristics of digital property and a model of the influence of the digital economy and global integration on modern economic relations. Potential opportunities for the economic development in the system of new economic relations were identified due to the SWOT-analysis of the conditions for the development of digital property in Russia. At the same time, endogenous institutional and target restrictions on the development of the digital economy in Russia (as weaknesses), as well as exogenous restrictions in the form of threats were specified. The authors found the strategic modeling of systems engineering education as a long-term basis for the development of the digital economy necessary. The research results can be used in developing national programs.

property, economic relations, institutes, digital economy, economic structure, national economy, global economy

1. Zubarev A.E. Digital economy as a form of patterns manifestation of the development of a new economy. Vestnik Tikhookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of PNU. 2017;(4):177–184. (In Russ.).

2. Apatova N.V. Digital economy: Main directions of development. Simferopol: Zueva T.V.; 2018. 216 p. (In Russ.).

3. Ageev A.I. Managing the digital future. Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy. 2018;12(3):6–23. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2220–6469–2018–12–3–6–23

4. Ageev A.I., Asanova E.A., Glibenko O.V., Remizov M.V., Smirnova V.A. Ready for a digit? Assessing the adaptability of the high-tech complex of Russia to the realities of the digital economy. Final report. Moscow: RAS Institute for Economic Strategies; 2018. 61 p. URL: http://spkurdyumov.ru/uploads/2018/05/To_the_figure_is_ ready_Estimation_of_the_adaptability_of_the_Russian_ITC_to_the_realities_of_the_digital_economy.pdf (In Russ.).

5. Schwab K., Davis N. Shaping the fourth industrial revolution. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Eksmo; 2018. 320 p. (In Russ.).

6. Salim’yanova I.G., Pogorel’tsev A.S. Digital transformation of the economy: An analysis of trends in the context of institutional economic theories (Part 1). Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2018;(6):7–14. (In Russ.).

7. Salim’yanova I.G., Pogorel’tsev A.S. Digital transformation of the economy: An analysis of trends in the context of institutional economic theories (Part 2). Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2019;(1):11–17. (In Russ.).

8. Grabova O.N., Sviridov N.N., Kozlova M.A. Factor analysis of the socio-economic development of the regions of the Central Federal District. Voprosy regional’noi ekonomiki = Problems of Regional Economy. 2016;(3):22–32. (In Russ.).

9. Su H.-N., Moaniba I.M. Investigating the dynamics of interdisciplinary evolution in technology developments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;(122):12–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.024

10. DellaPosta D., Nee V., Opper S. Endogenous dynamics of institutional change. Rationality and Society.2017;29(1):5–48. DOI: 10.1177/1043463116633147

11. Grabova O.N., Suglobov A.E., Karpovich O.G. Evolutionary institutional analysis and prospects of developing tax systems. Revista Espacios. 2018;39(16):40. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/851a/5992157c335ad2678903 9d65056e90446570.pdf.

12. Brezis E.S. Legal conflicts of interest of the revolving door. Journal of Macroeconomics. 2017;52:175–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.04.006

13. Markey-Towler B. The competition and evolution of ideas in the public sphere: A new foundation institutional theory. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2019;15(1):27–48. DOI: 10.1017/S 1744137418000061

14. Erznkyan B. A. Systemic-institutional paradigm of managing organizations of a new technological structure. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki = Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences. 2019;4(1):63–69. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21603/2500–3372–2019–4–1–63–69

15. Agénor P.-R. Caught in the middle? The economics of middle-income traps. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2017;31(3):771–791. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12175

16. Lee J.-D., Baek C., Maliphol S., Yeon J.-I. Middle innovation trap. Forsait = Foresight and STI Governance. 2019;13(1):6–18. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/2500–2597.2019.1.6.18

17. Vivarelli M. The middle income trap: A way out based on technological and structural change. Economic Change and Restructuring. 2016;49(2–3):159–193. DOI: 10.1007/s10644–015–9166–6

18. Assessment of the forecast of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation for the period 2019–2024. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2018;22(6):153–156. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587– 5671–2018–22–6–153–156

19. Taffesse A., Tadesse F. Pathways less explored — Locus of control and technology adoption. Journal of African Economies. 2017;26(1 Suppl.): i36-i72. DOI: 10.1093/jae/ejx013

20. Sukharev O.S. Managing the structure of technological development: Risk and “interest portfolio”. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2019;10(1):2–15. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2019–10–1–1