INFORMATION SUPPORT IN THE FIELD OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: PROBLEMS AND DEVELOPMENT
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2017-21-3-123-128
Abstract
References
1. KPMG (2017) Trend 4: Investors are starting to care about social and environmental impacts … not just financial returns, Available at: https://home.kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2017/01/trend 4-prioritizingsocial-and-environmental-value.html.
2. Krasnova M.V. Bukhgalterskoye obespecheniye podgotovki sotsial’noy otchetnosti [Accounting support of the social reporting preparation]. Mezhdunarodnyy bukhgalterskiy uchet — International Accounting, 2012, no. 9, pp. 39–44 (in Russian).
3. Pashigoreva G.I., Kosonogova E.S. Otchetnost’ ob ustoychivom razvitii (GRI): kontseptsiya razvitiya / Rossiya i Sankt-Peterburg: ekonomika i obrazovaniye v XXI veke; nauchnaya sessiya professorsko-prepodavatel’skogo sostava, nauchnykh sotrudnikov i aspirantov po itogam NIR za 2015 god: sbornik luchshikh dokladov [Sustainability Reporting (GRI): the concept of development / Russia and St. Petersburg: Economics and Education in the 21st Century. Scientific session of academic teaching staff, researchers and PhD students summarizing the R&D results for 2015: a collection of the best reports]. 2016, pp. 51–53 (in Russian).
4. KPMG (2015). Currents of Change the KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015. Available at: www.kpmg.com/crreporting.
5. E.P. Crawford, C.C. Williams Should corporate social reporting be voluntary or mandatory? Evidence from the banking sector in France and the United States, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2010, no. 10 (4), pp. 512–526.
6. Muray V. Yu. Simbioz dvukh napravleniy: sotsial’nogo i ekonomicheskogo [A symbiosis of social and economic directions]. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta — Bulletin of Financial University, 2016, no. 2 (92), pp. 81–84 (in Russian).
7. Aupperle K., Carroll A., Hatfield D. Empiricheskoye issledovaniye vzaimosvyazi mezhdu korporativnoy sotsial’noy otvetstvennost’yu i rentabel’nost’yu [Empirical study of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability]. Akademiya upravleniya — Academy of Management Journal, 1985, no. 28.
8. Porter M., Kramer M. The Competitive advantages of corporate kphilanthropy, Harvard Business Review, 2002, no. 11.
9. Watrick S. Evolyutsiya modeli korporativnoy sotsial’noy effektivnosti [Evolution of the corporate social efficiency model]. Akademiya upravleniya — Academy of Management, 2004, no. 10.
10. Delbard O. CSR legislation in France and the European regulatory paradox: an analysis of EU CSR policy and sustainability reporting practice Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2008, 8 (4), pp. 397–405.
11. Solovey T. N. Otrazheniye sotsial’noy aktivnosti sel’skokhozyaystvennogo predpriyatiya v finansovoy otchetnosti [Reflection of social activity of an agricultural enterprise in financial reporting]. Bukhuchet v sel’skom khozyaystve — Accounting in Agriculture, 2014, no. 1, pp. 76–83 (in Russian).
12. Kharitonova E.N. Pokazateli sotsial’no otvetstvennoy deyatel’nosti promyshlennykh predpriyatiy [Socially responsible activity indices of industrial enterprises]. Upravlencheskiye nauki — Management Sciences, 2012, no. 2, pp. 48–55 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Yarysh A.A. INFORMATION SUPPORT IN THE FIELD OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: PROBLEMS AND DEVELOPMENT. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2017;21(3):123-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2017-21-3-123-128