THE SOCIAL VECTOR OF A MIXED MODEL OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
The social vector of regulating capabilities of field-used models and their impact on social and economic development are investigated. The focus is made on the widely discussed thesis of the necessity of an organic combination of the state regulation with market self-regulation and self-development of market players.
Based on the mixed (convergent or double-track) model of social and economic development it is concluded that the state regulation should be used with better efficiency and effectiveness by creating the most favorable macroeconomic conditions for the life of population and business development.
Keywords
social feeling of the population,
models of socio-economic development,
market,
market self-regulation,
regulatory capacity of the state,
regulatory potential of social development,
regulatory impact effectiveness
Supporting agencies: The paper was prepared under the grant of the President of the Russian Federation NSH-1182.2014.6 «Leading Scientific Schools».
About the Author
A. I. Tatarkin
the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ScD (Economics), Professor, Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Director of the Institute for Economics
References
1. Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Translated from English; the Foreword by V.A. Afanasiev. M.: EKSMO, 2009, 960 p.
2. Makarov V.L. K voprosu o proektnoi ekonomike [On the issue of project economics]. Ekonomicheskie nauki sovremennoi Rossii — Economics of Contemporary Russia, 2013, no. 3, pp. 8–14. (In Russ.)
3. Bocharova A.K. Razvitie instituta otsenki effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo upravleniia [Development of the institution for evaluating the government efficiency]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia — World Economy and International Relations, 2013, no. 9, pp. 69–75. (In Russ.)
4. Tatarkin A.I. Gosudarstvenno-pravovoe regulirovanie v Rossii. Kak ego otsenivat’? [State and legal regulation in Russia. How to assess it?]. Ekonomika i upravlenie — Economics and Management, 2013, no. 9, pp. 3–10. (In Russ.)
5. Kirillova N. Adam Smit i «nevidimaia ruka» [Adam Smith and the «invisible hand»]. Chelovek i trud — Man and labor, 2013, no. 11–12, pp.13–18. (In Russ.)
6. Margolin A., Buchnev O. Pravotvorcheskaia deiatel’nost’: otsenka reguliruiushchego vozdeistviia [Legislative activities: assessment of the regulatory impact]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniia — Problems of the theory and practice of management, 2014, no. 1, pp. 24–28. (In Russ.)
7. Todosiichuk A. Nauka kak ob”ekt gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniia [Science as an object of state regulation]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniia — Problems of the theory and practice of management, 2014, no. 1, pp. 8–17. (In Russ.)
8. Zutler I.A. Optimal’nost» vybora markovskim bluzhdeniem [The optimal choice by using Markov random walk]. Zhurnal novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii — Journal of the New Economic Association, 2013, no. 4, pp. 33–51.
9. Eisen N., Gorbunov V. Politekonomicheskie aspekty realizatsii funktsii upravleniia sistemoi nauka — proizvodstvo — potreblenie» [Political economy aspects in the «science — production — consumption» system management]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika — Society and Economy, 2013, no. 11–12, pp. 67–84. (In Russ.)
10. Daskovskii V.B., Kiselev V.B. Kontury novoi modeli razvitiia ekonomiki Rossii [Outline of a new model of the Russian economic development]. M.: Kanon+ ROOI «Reabilitatsiia» Publishers», 2013, 592 p. (In Russ.)
11. Marshall A. Principles of Economics / foreword by J.M. Keynes; translated from English by V.I. Bomkina, V.T. Rysina, R.I. Stolper. M.: Eksmo, 2008, 832 p.
12. Galbraith J.K. The Third Crisis in Economics. Mir Peremen — World of Change, 2013, no. 1, pp. 24–28.
13. Fomchenkov T. Soberut u odnogo okna. Vse nalogi dlia malogo biznesa mogut zamenit» odnim platezhom [Gathered in a single window. All taxes for small businesses to be replaced with one payment]. Rossiiskaia gazeta — The Russian Newspaper, 2014, 28 January. URL: http://www.podatinet.net/index2.php?id=34824&Itemid=34&option= com_content&page=0&pop=1&task=view (access as of 19.08.2014).
14. D. Biznes i grazhdan priglashaiut kontrolirovat» gosraskhody // Ekonomika i zhizn». 2014, no 5. pp. 1–2.
15. Ol’sevich Iu.Ia. Ekonomicheskaia nauka i politika pered fundamental’noi neopredelennost’iu rynka // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013, no 6. pp. 92–95.
16. Baskovskii V., Kiselev V. Ob upravlenii ekonomicheskim rostom i razvitiem // Investitsii v Rossii. 2014, no 2, pp. 3–14.
17. Kleiner G.B. Ekonomicheskie zadachi ne reshit» bez uchastiia gosudarstva // Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. 2013, no 2. pp. 7–10.
18. Tatarkin A.I., Nekrasov A.A. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie podkhody k otsenke strategii gorodov-millionnikov: rol» mestnogo soobshchestva // Upravlenets, 2014, no 1, pp. 19–25.
Review
For citations:
Tatarkin A.I. THE SOCIAL VECTOR OF A MIXED MODEL OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2014;(6):10-21. (In Russ.)
Views:
585
Email this article 