Debt burden, local Fiscal Decentralization and Fiscal Incentives of Regional Authorities
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2020-24-1-58-75
Abstract
About the Author
E. N. TimushevRussian Federation
Evgenii N. Timushev — Junior Researcher
References
1. Deryugin A. N. Regional budgets for the first four months of 2019: Maintaining trends. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii = Russian Economic Developments. 2019;(6):81–85. (In Russ.).
2. Vasyunina M. L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of inter-budget transfers to constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2017;10(2):38–43. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999–849X-2017–10–2–38–43
3. Alandarov R. A. Assessment of the correspondence of intergovernmental relations to the strategic development goals of the Russian Federation. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2017;10(1):75–82. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999–849X-2017–10–1–75–82
4. Kreindel’ V. M. Diagnostics of the dominant regime of budget policy of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy. 2008;(1):141–151. (In Russ.).
5. Suchkova O. V., Chemis A. Yu. Assessment of the sustainability of public debt of Russian regions. Vestnik Rossiiskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G. V. Plekhanova = Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2019;(4):72–84. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21686/2413–2829–2019–4–72–84
6. Sharov V. F., Karaev A. K. Stability of the budget system and problems of recovery of growth of the Russian economy. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2014;(5):73–83. (In Russ.).
7. Stroev P. V., Vlasyuk L. I. Debt burden of regions and regional policy. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2017;21(5):90–99. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2017–21–5–90–99
8. Filimon R., Romer T., Rosenthal H. Asymmetric information and agenda control: The bases of monopoly power in public spending. Journal of Public Economics. 1982:17(1):51–70. DOI: 10.1016/0047– 2727(82)90025–1 9. Inman R. P. The flypaper effect. NBER Working Paper. 2008;(14579). URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/ w14579.pdf
9. Logan R. Fiscal illusion and the Grantor government. Journal of Political Economy. 1986;94(6):1304–1318. DOI: 10.1086/261434
10. Timushev E. N. Revenues, grants and fiscal incentives: Assessment and causes of the effects of decentralization of the budget system of the Russian Federation. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2018;(1):71–90. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2018–1–71–90
11. Hines J. R., Thaler R. H. Anomalies: The flypaper effect. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1995;9(4):217– 226. DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.4.217
12. Becker E. The illusion of fiscal illusion: Unsticking the flypaper effect. Public Choice. 1996;86(1–2):85–102. DOI: 10.1007/BF00114876
13. Slack E. Local fiscal response to intergovernmental transfers. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1980;62(3):364–370. DOI: 10.2307/1927103
14. Megdal S. B. The flypaper effect revisited: An econometric explanation. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1987;69(2):347–351. DOI: 10.2307/1927243
15. Blundell R., Bond S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics. 1998;87(1):115–143. DOI: 10.1016/S 0304–4076(98)00009–8
16. Zouhaier H., Fatma M. Debt and economic growth. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 2014;4(2):440–448. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bb4c/477bba8787f3739c9f6f6ee3afd1673ca650. pdf
17. Chudik A. et al. Is there a debt-threshold effect on output growth? Review of Economics and Statistics. 2017;99(1):135–150. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00593
18. Yushkov A. O., Savul’kin I.L., Oding N. Yu. Intergovernmental relations in Russia: Still a pendulum? Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues. 2017;(5):38–59. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1999–5431–2017–0–5–38–59
19. Zulkarnay I. U. Why Russia has again been sliding from federalism to unitarianism. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues. 2018;(5):116–132. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1999– 5431–2018–0–5–116–132
20. Klistorin V. I. Interlevel financial flows in the budgetary system of the Russian Federation. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology. 2018;(2):33–51. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15372/REG20180202
21. Deryugin A. Regional budgets in 2017. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii = Russian Economic Developments. 2018;25(4):89–94. (In Russ.).
22. Mamedov et al. Problems of intergovernmental relations in Russia. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press; 2012. 188 p. (In Russ.).
23. Bozhechkova A. et al. Stabilization properties of transfers allocated to Russian regions from the federal budget. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press; 2018. 68 p. (In Russ.).
24. Bukharsky V. V., Lavrov A. M. Assessment of leveling and stimulating effects of intergovernmental transfers to the subjects of the Russian Federation. Nauchno-issledovatel’skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal. 2017;(1):9–21. (In Russ.).
25. Tumanyants K., Cecina Yu. Expenditures on social policy of the Russian regions in the coordinates “costbenefit”. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy. 2017;12(5):128–149. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18288/1994– 5124–2017–5–07
26. Proaño C. R., Schoder C., Semmler W. Financial stress, sovereign debt and economic activity in industrialized countries: Evidence from dynamic threshold regressions. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2014;45:17–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.02.005
27. Berben R.-P., Brosens T. The impact of government debt on private consumption in OECD countries. Economics Letters. 2007;94(2):220–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.06.033
28. Checherita-Westphal C., Rother P. The impact of high government debt on economic growth and its channels: An empirical investigation for the euro area. European Economic Review. 2012;56(7):1392–1405. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.06.007
29. Baum A., Checherita-Westphal C., Rother P. Debt and growth: New evidence for the euro area. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2013;32:809–821. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.07.004
30. Afanasiev M. P., Shash N. N. Macroeconomic consequences of growing public debt for the Russian economy. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues. 2016;(5):46–59. (In Russ.).
31. Alexeev M. et al. Fiscal decentralization, budget discipline, and local finance reform in Russia’s regions. Public Finance Review. 2019;47(4):679–717. DOI: 10.1177/1091142118804245
32. Neyapti B. Fiscal decentralization and deficits: International evidence. European Journal of Political Economy. 2010;26(2):155–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.01.001
Review
For citations:
Timushev E.N. Debt burden, local Fiscal Decentralization and Fiscal Incentives of Regional Authorities. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2020;24(1):58-75. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2020-24-1-58-75